Economic Analysis of Mastitis Control Measures in Cuddalore District of Tamil Nadu

R. John Christy¹ , S. Kothandaraman²

1. Division of Animal Husbandry (Faculty of Agriculture), Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, India.
2. Division of Animal Husbandry (Faculty of Agriculture), Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, India.

Correspondence should be addressed to: drchristy@gmail.com.

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Isroset-Journal
Vol.3 , Issue.10 , pp.7-12, Oct-2017

CrossRef-DOI:   https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrms/v3i10.712

Online published on Oct 30, 2017

Copyright © R. John Christy, S. Kothandaraman . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

357 Views    178 Downloads    105 Downloads

Abstract :
This study was planned to economically evaluate the clinical mastitis control strategies on the data collected from the herds having 2 to 8 animals in the randomly selected Cuddalore District of Tamil Nadu. Multistage random sampling technique was used to select the dairy farmers and dairy animals. In total, 900 farmers having dairy herd size of 2 to 8 were chosen again randomly from the selected blocks. Among 900 dairy farmers, 187 dairy farmers experienced mastitis incidence during the study period (Year 2014-15 and 2015-16). Three sets of different mastitis control measures and their combinations were evaluated with partial budget analysis. First set comprised of practicing a set of control measures such as practising washing of udders before and after milking, teat dipping, cleaning of stalls twice every day, keeping cows standing after milking for at least 30 minutes, fore stripping and lastly milking the clinically affected cows. Second and third control measures adopted are being dry cow therapy and culling of chronic cases, respectively. Partial budget analysis revealed that practicing first set of control measures (Measure I) along with dry cow therapy resulted in a highest net returns of Rs, 2181.11, practicing first set of control measures (Measure I) resulted in next higher net return of Rs.2122.59 and implementation of dry cow therapy ensued a lesser positive return of Rs. 1132.41. Though culling was considered as an effective mastitis control measure, the analysis found it as economically infeasible. Further, partial budget analysis revealed that implementation all other combinations of control measures (Measure III, II & III and I,II & III) resulted in only negative returns.

Key-Words / Index Term :
Clinical Mastitis, Mastitis Control, Economic Analysis, Partial Budget

References :
[1] Subbarama Naidu, A. and N. Kondaiah (2004). Livestock production and post production systems – Need for a pragmatic approach. Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketting., 18: 91-105.
[2] Chenyambuga, S.W., C.Waiswa, M.Saimo, P.Ngumi and P.S.Gwakisa (2010). Knowledge and perceptions of traditional livestock keepers on tick-borne diseases and sero-prevalence of Theileria parva around Lake Victoria Basin. Livestock Research for Rural Development., 22: 7
[3] Fourichon, C., H.Seegers,F.Beaudeau, L. Verfailleand N.Bareille (2001).Health-control costs in dairy farming systems in western France. Livestock Production Science., 68:141–156.
[4] Hurley, L. and E.Morrin (1997). Introduction to mastitis. In: Lactation by Hurley (Ed). University of Illinois, Urbana, USA.
[5] Schepers, J. A., and A. A. Dijkhuizen(1991). The economics of mastitis and mastitis control in dairy herds: a critical analysis of estimates published since 1970. Preventive Veterinary Medicine.,10:213–224.
[6] Halasa, T., K.Huijps, O. Osterasand H.Hogeveen (2007). Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: a review. Veterinary Quarterly., 29(1): 18-31.
[7] Slettbakk, T. , A. Jarstad ,B.Thomas,Farver and J.C. Holmes(1995). Impact of milking characteristics and morphology udder and teats on clinical mastitis in first- and second-lactation Norwegian cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine., 24: 235-244
[8] Seegers, H., C.Fourichonand Beaudeau, F. (2003). Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Veterinary Research., 34(5): 475-491.
[9] Hemme, T., O. Garcia, and A.Saha (2003). A review of milk production in india with particular emphasis on small-scale producers. (PPLPI Working Paper No. 2). International Farm Comparison Network, FAO. Retrieved July 01, 2009, from www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/pplpi/docarc/wp2.pdf.
[10] John Christy, R and R. Vijayalakshm (2014). Partial Budget Analysis of Mastitis Control Measures in Villupuram and Namakkal Districts of Tamil Nadu. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR),., 10(7): 1-4
[11] Mdegela, R,H., R. Ryoba,E.D .Karimuribo, E.J.Phiri, T.Løken, O.Reksen, E .Mtengeti and N.A.Urio. (2009). Prevalence of clinical and subclinical mastitis and quality of milk on smallholder dairy farms in Tanzania. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association.,. 80(3):163-8.
[12] Deb, R., A.Kumar, S.Chakraborty, A.K.Verma, R.Tiwari,K.Dhama, U.Singh, and S. Kumar(2013). Trends in diagnosis and control of bovine mastitis: a review. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science., 16(23):1653-61.
[13] Robert, A. , P. Roussel, N. Bareille, D. Ribaud, F. Sérieys, V. Heuchel and H. Seegers. (2008). Risk factors for new intramammary infections during the dry period in untreated dairy cows from herds using selective dry cow therapy. Animal., 2 (02) :247-254
[14] Runciman,D.J., J. Malmo and M. Deighton (2010). The use of an internal teat sealant in combination with Cloxacillin dry cow therapy for the prevention of clinical and subclinical mastitis in seasonal calving dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science., 93(10) :4582-4591
[15] Neave,F.K. , F.H. Dodd, R.G. Kingwill and D.R. Westgarth (1969). Control of mastitis in the dairy herd by hygiene and management. Journal of Dairy Science., 52 (5):696–707
[16] Beck, H.S., W.S. Wise and F.H. Dodd (1992). Cost benefit analysis of bovine mastitis in the UK. Journal of Dairy Research., 59(4):449-460.
[17] McDougall, S., K.I. Parker, C. Heuer, C.W.R. Compton (2009). A review of prevention and control of heifer mastitis via non-antibiotic strategies. Veterinary Microbiology.,134 (1–2) : 177-185
[18] Firat, M.Z. (1993). Susceptibility of clinical mastitis in successive lactations. Livestock Production Science., 34(1 & 2) : 175-180.
[19] Thirunavukkarasu, M. (1996). Economic analysis of Mastitis in Dairy Farms, Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University.
[20] Sandhol, M., M.L. Kaartinen and S. Pyorala (1990). Bovine mastitis - why does antibiotic therapy does not always work: An overview. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology Theory., 13 : 248- 260.
[21]Cullor, J.S. (1993). The control, treatment and prevention of the various types of bovine mastitis. Veterinary Medicine.,18: 571-579.