Dental Prophylaxis versus Dental-Facial Aesthetics, Data about Patients` Approach to These Treatments

Ilma Robo¹ , Saimir Heta² , Vera Ostreni³ , Fjoralba Sela⁴ , Blerta Rumano⁵ , Eva Haxhiu⁶ , Sonila Kapaj⁷

1. University of Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Therapy, Tirane, Albania.
2. University Hospital Hospital, Pediatric Surgery, Pediatric Surgeon, Tirana, Albania.
3. Department of Morphology, University of Medicine, Tiranë, Albania.
4. Albanian University, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Dentistry, Tirana, Albania.
5. University of Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Therapy, Tirane, Albania.
6. University of Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Therapy, Tirane, Albania.
7. Department of Gynecology, Hospital Center, Fier, Albania.

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal-Paper
Vol.9 , Issue.3 , pp.1-4, Dec-2022

Online published on Dec 31, 2022

Copyright © Ilma Robo, Saimir Heta, Vera Ostreni, Fjoralba Sela, Blerta Rumano, Eva Haxhiu, Sonila Kapaj . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

92 Views    161 Downloads    40 Downloads

Abstract :
Introduction: In facial dental esthetics and services to achieve attractive beauty for the human eye, more monthly funds of individual spending are spent on these services than the dental services of treatment of pathologies or dental prophylaxis. The study aims to present the concrete individual approach to dental prophylaxis and oral care, compared to the individual approach, versus facial aesthetics and not only, oriented around the idea of what the patient is inclined to choose today, cost, advantages, disadvantages and the risks of achieving the "perfect smile". Materials and methods: The study presents the collection of data from the survey of 70 individuals on the monthly services, the cost, that they perform specifically for facial aesthetics and for dental treatments or prophylaxis. The study was conducted on the processing of data collected from the survey of the target age group 20-45 years, in the geographical area of the cities of Elbasan and Tirana, in Albania. Results: 98% of individuals surveyed were aware of the services offered by facial aesthetics against the figure of 80% of individuals who had information about dental hygiene. For personal care and facial aesthetics (whether this is a cost realized with products in home conditions or in aesthetic centers) from the collected data it can be shown that such services capture "scary" figures compared to the cost of dental services. Such services in the span of one month are equal to the cost of annual services that these people spend in a dental office. Conclusions: The importance of providing information and evaluating the periodic care that patients should show on oral hygiene and oral health should be as important as any other treatment, be it aesthetic. The results showed that the concept of dental prophylaxis and its application today has changed and faded, due to the fact that patients tend to care more about facial aesthetics and "neglect" care towards oral health.

Key-Words / Index Term :
oral health, facial aesthetics, dental aesthetics, dental proficiency

References :
[1]. Poplinger A.; “Adherence to oral hygiene and dental self-care”; Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). Vol 27, Issue 2, pp. 62-63, 2010.
[2]. Robo Ilma, Heta Saimir, Lasku Geriona, Ostreni Vera; “Prevalence of Chronic Periodontitis: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study”; SciMedicine Journal. Vol 3, pp. 35-43, 2021.
[3]. Genco R. J.; “Current view of risk factors for periodontal diseases”; J. Periodontol, Vol. 67(Suppl.), pp. 1041–1049, 1996.
[4]. Grossi S. G., Zambon J. J., Ho A. W., Koch G., Dunford R. G., Machtei E. E., Norderyd O. M., Genco R.; “J. Assessment of risk for periodontal disease. I. Risk indicators for attachment loss”; J. Periodontol.Vol. 65, pp. 260–267, 1994.
[5]. Robo Ilma, Heta Saimir, Hamzai Fjona, Ostreni Vera; “The Effect of Conservative Periodontal Therapy at Patients with Systemic Diseases”; Archives of Internal Medicine Research. Vol, 02, pp 10-13, 2019.
[6]. Moon, Richard & Millar, Brian. Dental Aesthetics: A Study Comparing Patients’ Own Opinions with Those of Dentists. Open Journal of Stomatology. Vol. 07, pp 225-233, 2017.
[7]. Robo, Ilma & Heta, Saimir & Lasku, Geriona & Ostreni, Vera. Gingival recession and attachment loss: Cross-sectional and retrospective data of 10 years. Journal of Advanced Periodontology & Implant Dentistry. Vol. 13, pp 22-27, 2021.
[8]. Bu?u, Oprea Valentin & Cristina, Elena. The Divine Proportion’s Incidence in Facial and Dental Aesthetics. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala. Vol 10. pp 155, 2018.
[9]. Ilma Robo, Saimir Heta, Kristi Spiro et al. Topic: Complications and side effects of dental whitening procedures, available at Research Square Vol PREPRINT (Version 1), pp 21-25, 2022.
[10]. Philip D Marsh; “Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community – implications for health and disease”; BMC Oral Health. 2006; Vol 6(Suppl 1), pp 14-19, 2006.
[11]. Priya M, Devdas K, Amarlal D, Venkatachalapathy A. Oral health attitudes, knowledge and practice among school children in Chennai, India. J Educ Ethics Dent Vol 3, pp 26-33, 2013.
[12]. Robo, I., Heta, S., Gjumsi, E. et al. Oral Microflora, in Cases with Gingival Hypertrophy Caused by Fixed Orthodontic Appliances. SN Compr. Clin. Med. Vol 3, pp. 2511–2519, 2021.