Evaluating Effect of Fat, Sugar and Flour Substitutes on Properties of White Slice Dairy Bread

Debora Conde Molina¹ , Carla Quevedo² , Valeria Arqueros³

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal-Paper
Vol.7 , Issue.6 , pp.67-75, Dec-2020

Online published on Dec 31, 2020

Copyright © Debora Conde Molina, Carla Quevedo, Valeria Arqueros . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

Abstract :
White slice dairy bread (WSDB) is the most important industrial bread consumed in Argentina, it results an interesting target for developing a reduced calorie bread as it contains fat and sugar in its formulation. However, substitutions of ingredients should be carefully studied to keep original properties of the bread. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of three commercial products, Toler Fat Less Saladas (TFLS) as fat substitute, Granofiber Sweet (GS) as sugar substitute and Granofiber Sym 200 (GS200) as flour substitute, in order to improve nutritional profile of WSDB. The rheological properties, evaluated by Rheofermentograph and Mixolab, were studied on flour and on white slice dairy bread formulation. Additionally, texture profile analysis was applied on baked bread. TFLS caused a similar effect to fat. GS showed less gas production than sugar during fermentation stage, however baked bread presented similar loaf specific volume. Substitution of flour with GS200 revealed significant decrease of fermentation capacity and dough development. Otherwise, bread loaf specific volume showed satisfactory results when GS200 was applied, allowing to formulate a high fiber bread with similar end-product texture properties to original bread. We conclude that substitutes evaluated in this work can be used for breadmaking to improve nutritious quality of bread for health benefits.

Key-Words / Index Term :
White bread, fat substitute, sugar substitute, flour substitute, dough rheology, bread texture

References :
[1] D.W. Halam, W.P.T James. “Obesity”. Lancet. Vol. 366, pp.1197-1209, 2005.
[2] A. Mente, L. de Koning, H S. Shannon, S.S. Anand. “A systematic review of the evidence supporting a causal link between dietary factors and coronary heart disease”. Archives of Internal Medicine. Vol. 13169, No. 7, pp. 659-69, 2009.
[3] C. Hasler, A. Brown. “Position of the American Dietetic Association: Functional Foods”. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. Vol. 109, No. 4, pp. 735-46, 2009.
[4] M. Bastien, P. Poirier P, I. Lemieux, J.P. Després. “Overview of epidemiology and contribution of obesity to cardiovascular disease”. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 369-81, 2014.
[5] W.R. Kapsak, E.B. Rahavi, N. Childs, C. Christy White. “Functional foods: consumer attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors in a growing market”. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. Vol. 111, No. 6, pp. 804-10, 2011.
[6] P. Ronayne, C. Brites, C. Ferrero, M. Arocha, A.E. León AE. “Aspectos nutricionales y saludables de los productos de panificación”. CYTED, Uni¬versidad de Valparaíso, Chile, pp. 124 – 50, 2009.
[7] A.V. Gómez, D. Buchner, C.C. Tadini, M.C. Añón, M.C. Puppo. “Emulsifiers: effects on quality of fibre-enriched wheat bread”. Food and Bioprocess Technology. Vol. 6, pp. 1228–39, 2013.
[8] R. Schoenlechner, M. Szatmari, A. Bagdi, S. Tömösközi. “Optimisation of bread quality produced from wheat and proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) by adding emulsifiers, transglutaminase and xylanase”. LWT Food Science and Technology. Vol. 51, pp. 361–366, 2013.
[9] E.C. Nwanekezi, C.C. Ekwe, R.U. Agbugba. “Effect of substitution of sucrose with date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) fruit on quality of bread”. Journal Food Processing and Technology. Vol. 6, pp. 484, 2015.
[10] S. Pourafshar, K.A. Rosentrater, P.G. Krishnan. “Production of barbari bread (traditional iranian bread) using different levels of distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) and sodium stearoyl lactate (SSL)”. Foods. Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 31, 2018.
[11] E.M. Stefan, G. Voicu, G. Constantin, M.G. Munteanu, G. Ipate. “Effect of sugar substitutes on wheat dough rheology”. St. Cerc. St. CICBIA. Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 313-20, 2019.
[12] D.N. Abang Zaidel, N.L. Chin, Y.A. Yusof. “A review on rheological properties and measurements of dough and gluten”. Journal of Applied Sciences. Vol. 10, pp. 2478-90, 2013.
[13] C. Collar, C. Bollaín, C.M. Rosell. “Rheological behaviour of formulated bread doughs during mixing and heating”. Food Science and Technology International. Vol. 13, No. 2, pp 99-107, 2007.
[14] M. Chandrasekaran. “Valorization of food processing by products”. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, USA, pp 554-82, 2013.
[15] ISO 712. “Cereal and cereal products, determination of moisture content, Reference method”. ISO International. 2009.
[16] AOAC Official Method 923.03. “Ash of flour”. Arlington, Virgina, USA, AOAC International, 1990.
[17] AACC Method 38-12. “Wet gluten, dry gluten, water-binding capacity, and gluten Index”. AACC Approved Methods of Analysis, 11th Edition, St. Paul, MN, USA.
[18] AACC Method 56-81B. “Determination of Falling Number”. AACC Approved Methods of Analysis, 11th Edition, St. Paul, MN, USA.
[19] AACC Method 54-30A. “Alveograph method for soft and hard wheat flour”. AACC Approved Methods of Analysis, 11th Edition, St. Paul, MN, USA.
[20] AACC Method 54-60.01. “Determination of rheological behavior as a function of mixing and temperature increase in wheat flour and whole wheat meal by Mixolab”. AACC Approved Methods of Analysis, 11th Edition, St. Paul, MN, USA.
[21]. AACC Method 76-33. “Damaged starch, amperometric method by SDmatic”. AACC Approved Methods of Analysis, 11th Edition, St. Paul, MN, USA.
[22] Chopin. “Rheofermentograph user´s guide”. Tripette & Renaud, France, 1996.
[23] Chopin. “Mixolab, user´s guide”. Tripette & Renaud, Francia; 2012.
[24] AACC Method 10-05. “Guidelines for measurement of volume by rapeseed displacement”. AACC Approved Methods of Analysis, 11th Edition, St. Paul, MN, USA.
[25] AACC Method 74-09. “Measurement of bread firmness by universal testing machine”. AACC Approved Methods of Analysis, 11th Edition, St. Paul, MN, USA.
[26] M.C. Bourne. “Food texture and viscosity: concept and measurement”. Academic press, San Diego, USA, 2002.
[27] B.O. Ajibade, O.A. Ijabadeniyi. “Effects of pectin and emulsifiers on the physical and nutritional qualities and consumer acceptability of wheat composite dough and bread”. Journal of Food Science and Technology. Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 83-92, 2019.
[28] V.A. Vaclavik, E.W. Christian. “Essentials of food science”. Springer Science+Business Media, New York, USA, 2014.
[29] A. Aamodt, E.M. Magnus, E.M. Faergestad. “Effect of flour quality, ascorbic acid, and DATEM on dough rheological parameters and hearth loaves characteristics”. Journal of Food Science. Vol. 68, pp. 2201-10, 2003.
[30] M. Shafisoltani, M. Salehifar, M. Hashemi. “Effects of enzymatic treatment using response surface methodology on the quality of bread flour”. Food Chemistry. Vol. 148, pp. 176–83, 2014.
[31] M.E. Steffolani, P.D. Ribotta, G.T. Pérez, A.E. León. “Effect of glucose oxidase, transglutaminase, and pentosanase on wheat proteins: relationship with dough properties and bread-making quality”. Journal of Cereal Science. Vol. 51, pp. 366–73, 2010.
[32] J.E. Obiegbuna, P.I. Akubor, C.N. Ishiwu, J. Ndife. “Effect of substituting sugar with date palm pulp meal on the physicochemical, organoleptic and storage properties of bread”. African Journal of Food Science. Vol. 7, pp. 113-19, 2013.
[33] W.M. Kim, M.K. Kim, M.W. Byun, G.H. Lee. “Physical and sensory characteristics of bread prepared by substituting sugar with yacon concentrate”. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition. Vol. 41, No. 9, pp.1288-93, 2012.
[34] E.J. Kim, K.S. Lee. “Quality characteristics of white pan bread with honey”. Culinary Science and Hospitality Research. Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 147-60, 2013.
[35] J.E. Bock, S. Damodaran. “Bran-induced changes in water structure and gluten conformation in model gluten dough studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy”. Food Hydrocolloids. Vol. 31, No. 2, pp 146-55, 2013.
[36] I.B.H. Ahmed, A. Hannachi, C.M. Haros. “Combined effect of chia flour and soy lecithin incorporation on nutritional and technological quality of fresh bread and during staling”. Foods. Vol. 9, pp. 446, 2020.
[37] C. Collar, E. Santos, C.M. Rosell. “Assessment of the rheological profile of fibre-enriched bread doughs by response surface methodology”. Journal Food of Engineering. Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 820-26, 2007.
[38] Q. Li, R. Liu, T. Wu, M. Wang, M. Zhang. “Soluble dietary fiber fractions in wheat bran and their interactions with wheat gluten have impacts on dough properties”. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry. Vol. 64, pp. 8735–44, 2016.
[39] G. Montemayor Mora, K.E.Hernández Reyes, E. Heredia Olea. “Rheology, acceptability and texture of wheat flour tortillas supplemented with soybean residue”. Journal of Food Science and Technolology. Vol 55, No. 12, pp. 4964-72, 2018.
[40] T.A. Zafar, F. Al-Hassawi, F. Al-Khulaifi, G. Al-Rayyes, C. Waslien, F.G. Huffman. “Organoleptic and glycemic properties of chickpea-wheat composite breads”. Journal of Food Science and Technology. Vol. 52, pp. 2256-63, 2015.
[41] A.I. Olagunju. “Influence of whole wheat flour substitution and sugar replacement with natural sweetener on nutritional composition and glycaemic properties of multigrain bread”. Preventive Nutrition and Food Science. Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 456–67. 2019.
[42] M. Kurek, J. Wyrwisz, M. Piwi?ska, A. Wierzbicka. “Application of the response surface methodology in optimizing oat fiber particle size and flour replacement in wheat bread rolls”. CyTA – Journal of Food. Vol. 14, No.1, pp. 18-26, 2016.
[41] S. Verdú, J.M. Barat, R. Grau. “Improving bread-making processing phases of fibre-rich formulas using chia (Salvia hispanica) seed flour”. LWT- Food Science and Technology. Vol. 84, pp. 419-25, 2017.