Full Paper View Go Back

Rohu Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) changes feeding strategy throughout its ontogeny: An explanation from feeding ecology

Sandip Majumder1 , Neha Majumdar2 , Pinki Ghosh3 , Surjya Kumar Saikia4 , Samar Kumar Saha5

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Isroset-Journal
Vol.5 , Issue.4 , pp.92-96, Aug-2018


CrossRef-DOI:   https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrbs/v5i4.9296


Online published on Aug 31, 2018


Copyright © Sandip Majumder, Neha Majumdar, Pinki Ghosh, Surjya Kumar Saikia, Samar Kumar Saha . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library


XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

  • IEEE Citation
  • MLA Citation
  • APA Citation
  • BibTex Citation
  • RIS Citation

IEEE Style Citation: Sandip Majumder, Neha Majumdar, Pinki Ghosh, Surjya Kumar Saikia, Samar Kumar Saha, “Rohu Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) changes feeding strategy throughout its ontogeny: An explanation from feeding ecology,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Biological Sciences, Vol.5, Issue.4, pp.92-96, 2018.

MLA Style Citation: Sandip Majumder, Neha Majumdar, Pinki Ghosh, Surjya Kumar Saikia, Samar Kumar Saha "Rohu Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) changes feeding strategy throughout its ontogeny: An explanation from feeding ecology." International Journal of Scientific Research in Biological Sciences 5.4 (2018): 92-96.

APA Style Citation: Sandip Majumder, Neha Majumdar, Pinki Ghosh, Surjya Kumar Saikia, Samar Kumar Saha, (2018). Rohu Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) changes feeding strategy throughout its ontogeny: An explanation from feeding ecology. International Journal of Scientific Research in Biological Sciences, 5(4), 92-96.

BibTex Style Citation:
@article{Majumder_2018,
author = {Sandip Majumder, Neha Majumdar, Pinki Ghosh, Surjya Kumar Saikia, Samar Kumar Saha},
title = {Rohu Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) changes feeding strategy throughout its ontogeny: An explanation from feeding ecology},
journal = {International Journal of Scientific Research in Biological Sciences},
issue_date = {8 2018},
volume = {5},
Issue = {4},
month = {8},
year = {2018},
issn = {2347-2693},
pages = {92-96},
url = {https://www.isroset.org/journal/IJSRBS/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=773},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v5i4.9296}
publisher = {IJCSE, Indore, INDIA},
}

RIS Style Citation:
TY - JOUR
DO = {https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v5i4.9296}
UR - https://www.isroset.org/journal/IJSRBS/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=773
TI - Rohu Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) changes feeding strategy throughout its ontogeny: An explanation from feeding ecology
T2 - International Journal of Scientific Research in Biological Sciences
AU - Sandip Majumder, Neha Majumdar, Pinki Ghosh, Surjya Kumar Saikia, Samar Kumar Saha
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/08/31
PB - IJCSE, Indore, INDIA
SP - 92-96
IS - 4
VL - 5
SN - 2347-2693
ER -

870 Views    309 Downloads    87 Downloads
  
  

Abstract :
Labeo rohita is a popular Indian major carp species in carp polyculture practice. It is known as water column feeder which feeds on plankton. In the juvenile and adult stages rohu is essentially an herbivorous column feeder, preferring algae and submerged vegetation. Under natural condition, in fingerling stage, it prefers zooplankton, with phytoplankton as subsidiary food. At this stage it exhibited a strong positive selection for all zooplanktonic organisms and smaller phytoplankton. Adults show a strong negative selection for all zooplanktonic organisms and positive selection for most phytoplanktonic organisms. However, in periphytic environment, it ingests sub-periphytic organisms present in proximity to substrate. In conclusion, it is agreed that L. rohita exhibits different feeding strategy during its growth from fingerling to adult and also from planktonic to periphytic environment. Adoption of a fish culture strategy according to its differential feeding strategy would maximize in converting naturally available resources to fish biomass especially in polyculture practice.

Key-Words / Index Term :
Indian Major Carp, feed selectivity, resource-partitioning, polyculture, periphyton, phytoplankton

References :
[1] V.G. Jhingran, “Fish and Fisheries of India”, 3rd edn, Hindustan Publishing Corporation, Delhi, India, 1991.
[2] N.N. Memon, F.N. Talpur, M.I. Bhanger, “Nutritional aspects and seasonal influence on fatt y acid composition of carp (Labeo rohita) from the Indus River, Pakistan”, Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 60(3), 217-223, 2010.
[3] S. Ahmed, A.F.M.A. Rahman, M.G. Mustafa, M.B. Hossain, N. Nahar, “Nutrient composition of indigenous and exotic fishes of rainfed waterlogged paddy fields in Lakshmipur, Bangladesh”, World Journal of Zoology, 7(2), 135-140, 2012.
[4] N. Roos, M.M. Islam, S.H. Thilsted, “Small Indigenous Fish Species in Aquaculture in Bangladesh: Contribution to Vitamin A, Calcium, and Iron Intakes”, Journal of Nutrition, 133, 4021S–4026S, 2003.
[5] S.M. Das, S.K. Moitra, “Studies on the food of some common fishes of Uttar Pradesh, India. 1. Surface-feeders, mid-feeders and bottom feeders”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (B), 25, 1-6, 1955.
[6] S. Dewan, M.M. Ali, M.A. Islam, “Studies on the size and patterns of feeding of fries and fingerlings of three major carps viz. Labeo rohita (Ham.), Catla catla (Ham.) and Cirrhinus mrigala (Ham.)”, Bangladesh Journal of Agriculture, 2, 223-228, 1977.
[7] V.G. Jhingran, R.S.V. Pullin, “A hatchery manual for the common, Chinese and Indian major carp”, 191p Asian Development Bank, ICLARM Studies and Reviews, 1985.
[8] M.A. Wahab, Z.F. Ahmed, M.S. Haq, M. Begum, “Compatibility of silver carp in the polyculture of cyprinid fishes”, Progressive Agriculturist, 5, 221-227, 1994.
[9] M.I.U. Miah, S. Dewan, M. Wahiduzzaman, “Studies on the type and amount of food taken by silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (val.) and its diet patterns of feeding in Bangladesh pond”, Bangladesh Journal of Fisheries, 7, 49-54, 1984.
[10] N.F.E.P. “Production enhancement of Indian major carps, Labeo rohita (Ham.) using bamboo trimmings as a substrate for the growth of periphyton”, NFEP paper No. 10, Northwest Fisheries Extension Project, Parbatipur, Dinajpur, Bangladesh, 1997.
[11] M.R. Ramesh, K.M. Shankar, C.V. Mohan, T.J. Varghese, “Comparison of three plant substrates for enhancing carp growth through bacterial biofilm”, Aquaculture Engineering, 19, 119-131, 1999.
[12] M.E. Azim, M.A. Wahab, A.A. van Dam, M.C.M. Beveridge, M.C.J. Verdegem, “The potential of periphyton-based culture of two Indian major carps, Rohu Labeo rohita (Hamilton) and gonia Labeo gonius (Linnaeus)”, Aquaculture Research, 32, 209-216, 2001.
[13] A. Muhammad, R. Iqbal, S.A. Rana, M. Athar, F. Iqbal, “Effect of feed cycling on specific growth rate, condition fector and RNA/DNA ratio of Labeo rohita”, African Journal of Biotechnology, 5(17), 1551-1556, 2006.
[14] R.A. Khan, A.Q. Siddique, “Food selection by Labeo rohita and its feeding relationship with other major carps”, Hydrobiologia, 43(3-4), 429-442, 1973.
[15] S. Majumder, P. Ghosh, S.K. Saha, S.K. Saikia, “Study on food selection of Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) by determining electivity index in periphyton based and periphyton free monoculture pond”, International Journal of Applied Research, 2(3), 4-7, 2016.
[16] M. Alam, S. Sharma, J.K. Pathak, “Food preferences of Labeo rohita (Hamilton) in river Ramganga, Uttar Pradesh, India”, International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture Sciences, 1(2), 99-105, 2011.
[17] M.M. Rahman, Y.M. Hossain, Q. Jo, S.K. Kim, J. Ohtomi, C. Meyer, “Ontogenetic shift in dietary preference and low dietary overlap in rohu (Labeo rohita) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio) in semi-intensive polyculture ponds”, Ichthyology Research, 56, 28-36, 2008.
[18] H.A. Khan, V.G. Jhingran, “Synopsis of Biological Data on Rohu, Cirrhinus mrigala (Hamilton, 1822)”, FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 111, pp. 100, FAO, Rome, 1975.
[19] I.S. Ivlev, “Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes”, Yale University Press, 302p, New Heaven, Connecticut, USA, 1961.
[20] M.M. Rahman, M.C.J. Verdegam, L.A.J. Nagelkerke, M.A. Wahab, A. Milstein, J.A.J. Verreth, “Growth, production and food preference of Labeo rohita (H.) in monoculture and in polycutlure with Common carp Cyprinus carpio (L.) under fed and non-fed ponds”, Aquaculture, 257(1-4), 359-372, 2006.
[21] B. Moss, “Ecology of Freshwaters, Man and Medium, Past to Future”, 3rd edn, Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, 1998.
[22] D.I. Nwankwo, “Periphyton algae on fishfenses “ACADJA” in a tropical open lagoon”, Internatioal Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 17, 1-10, 1991.
[23] A.K.Y. Haroon, K.A. Pittman, “Niche measurements and feeding strategies of Barbodes gonionotus and Oreochromis spp. from rice fields in Bangladesh”, Bangladesh Journal of Fisheries Research, 4, 13-26, 2000.
[24] K.M. Shankar, C.V. Mohan, M.C. Nandeesha, “Promotion of substrate based microbial biofilm in ponds-a low cost technology to boost fish production”, NAGA, The ICLARM Quarterly, 21, 18-22, 1998.
[25] P. Keshavanath, B. Gangadhar, T.J. Ramesh, J.M. van Rooij, M.C.M. Beveridge, D.J. Baird, M.C.J. Verdegem, A.A. van Dam, “Use of artificial substrates to enhance production of freshwater herbivorous fish in pond culture”, Aquaculture Research, 12, 189-197, 2001a.
[26] M.E. Azim, M.C.J. Verdegem, M.M. Rahman, M.A. Wahab, A.A. van Dam, M.C.M. Beveridge, “Evaluation of polyculture with Indian major carps in periphyton based ponds”, Aquaculture, 213, 131-149, 2002.
[27] P. Keshavanath, T.J. Ramesh, B. Gangadhara, M.C.M. Beveridge, A.A. van Dam, M.C.J. Verdegem, “On-farm evaluation of Indian major carp production with sugarcane bagasse as subatrate for periphyton”, Asian Fisheries Science, 14, 367-376, 2001b.
[28] E. Montchowui, P. Laleye, J. Moreau, J.C. Philippart, P. Poncin, “Population parameters of African carp, Labeo parvus Boulenger, 1902 (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in the Oueme River in Benin (West Africa)”, North Western Journal of Zoology, 5, 26-33, 2009.
[29] S.K. Saikia, D.N. Das, “Feeding Ecology of Common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) in Rice-Fish culture system of Apatani Plateau, Arunachal Pradesh, India”, Aquatic Ecology, 43, 559-568, 2009.
[30] S.K. Saikia, S. Majumder, S. Nandi, S.K. Saha, “Feeding ecology of the freshwater fish Rohu, Labeo rohita (Hamilton 1822): A case of intelligent feeding in the periphyton-based environment”, Zoology and Ecology, 23(4), 266-274, 2013.
[31] K.R. Allen, “Studies on the biology of the early stages of the salmon (Salmo salar)”, Journal of Animal Ecology, 10(1), 47-76, 1941.
[32] M.W. Miller, A. Falace “Evaluation methods for trophic resource factor-nutrients, primary production, and associated assemblages”, In: Seaman Jr. W (ed.) Artificial Reef Evaluation with Application to Natural Habitats, CRC Press, Florida, USA, pp. 95-126, 2000.
[33] M.E. Azim, M.M. Rahman, M.A. Wahab, T. Asaeda, D.C. Little, M.C.J. Verdegem, “Periphyton-based pond polyculture system: a bioeconomic comparison of on-farm and on-station trials”, Aquaculture, 242, 381-396, 2004.
[34] S. Rai, Y. Yil, M.A. Wahab, A.N. Bart, J.S. Diana, “Comparison of rice straw and bamboo stick substrates in periphyton-based carp polyculture systems”, Aquaculture Research, 39, 464-473, 2008.

Authorization Required

 

You do not have rights to view the full text article.
Please contact administration for subscription to Journal or individual article.
Mail us at  support@isroset.org or view contact page for more details.

Go to Navigation