Technological Innovation in Crime Prevention in Nigeria

Yakubu Ajiji Makeri¹

Section:Review Paper, Product Type: Isroset-Journal
Vol.6 , Issue.6 , pp.60-72, Dec-2018

CrossRef-DOI:   https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrcse/v6i6.6072

Online published on Dec 31, 2018

Copyright © Yakubu Ajiji Makeri . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

557 Views    178 Downloads    141 Downloads

Abstract :
The exploring how and why certain innovations are adopted and the effects of technology-driven solutions on the problem of crime, technological innovations have been developed to prevent crime and to improve the performance of police. Such extended applications of those techniques have become the threats to individual rights such as right to privacy, freedom of expression, the right to freedom of association and assembly, the right to freedom of movement and the due process rights. Recently, the rate of crime in Nigeria has increased to the level which it has generated public uproar to the government for immediate solution. Government has put in place various security measures and policies to protect the lives and properties of its citizens but to no avail. Armed robbery, kidnapping, murder, rape, arson, terrorism, bomb attacks and other crimes have been the order of the day in Nigeria. To this end, this paper seeks to analyze the impact of technological innovation on crime prevention and effective policing in Nigeria. But we know remarkably little about how and why certain innovations are adopted, and the consequences –both intended and unintended—of technology-driven solutions to the problem of crime. This article provides an examination of a wide range of new technological innovations that have applications in the areas of crime prevention generally, and crime control (by police) in particular. The findings show that understanding the effects of technological change is a crucial issue in contemporary policing because in recent times, many developments have been in place with respect to Information Technology (IT), analytic system, video surveillance systems, DNA testing, and other technologies that have far reaching implications for policing. Also, technological innovations bring about change in types of crime, change in criminals’ attitude and their mode of operation.

Key-Words / Index Term :
Technology-driven solutions on the problem of crime, technological innovations

References :
[1]. Alexander, J. (2001).An overview of the future of non-lethal weapons. Medicine,Conflict, and Survival.
[2]. ALPERT, G., SMITH, M., KAMINSKI, R., FRIDELL, L., MACDONALD, J. AND KUBU, B. (2011). “Police use of force, tasers and other less-lethal weapons” NIJ Research in Brief 1-19 (May, 2011). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
[3]. Batton , C. and Wilson, S. (2006). Police murders: An examination of historical trends in the killing of law enforcement officers in the United States, 1947-1998. Homicide Studies, 10:79-97.
[4]. BRAGA, A. (2006). “Policing crime hot spots” in B. Welsh and D. Farrington, eds. Preventing Crime: What works for Children, Offenders, Victims, and Places, 179-193. Great Britain: Springer.
[5]. BRAGA, A., FLYNN, E., KELLING, G., AND COLE, C. (2011) “Moving the Work of Criminal Investigators Towards Crime Control” New Perspectives in Policing. Cambridge: Harvard Kennedy School.
[6]. BYRNE, J. (2009). The New Generation of Concentrated Community Supervision Strategies: Focusing Resources on High Risk Offenders, Times, and Places. (Washington, DC: A Report for the Public Safety Performance Project, the Pew Charitable Trusts). BYRNE, J. (2008) “Editorial Introduction-The social ecology of community corrections: understanding the link between individual and community change”. Criminology and Public Policy,
[7]. BYRNE, J. and REBOVICH, D. (2007). The New technology of Crime, Law and Social Control Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press. BYRNE, J. and REBOVICH, D. (2007). “Introduction. The New Technology of Crime, Law and Social Control.” In: BYRNE, J. and REBOVICH, D.(2007). The New technology of Crime, Law and Social Control, Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press,
[8]. BYRNE, J. and PATTAVINA, A. (2007). “Institutional Corrections and Soft Technology”. In BYRNE, J. and REBOVICH, D. (2007). The New technology of Crime, Law and Social Control, Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, p. 245-286. BYRNE, J. and TAXMAN, F. (2006). “Crime Control Strategies and Community Change” Federal Probation June: 3-12.
[9]. BYRNE, J. and TAXMAN, F. (2005). “Crime (Control) is a Choice: Divergent Perspectives on the Role of Treatment in the Adult Corrections System” Criminology and Public Policy,
[10]. CHAN, J. (2001). “The Technology game: How information technology is transforming police practice” Journal of Criminal Justice, 1:139-159. CLARKE, R. V. (1997). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies. Albany, NY:Harrow and Heston
[11]. (COLE, D., and LOBEL, J. (2007). Less safe, Less Free: Why America is Losing the War on Terror. New York: The New Press. CORBETT, R. and MARX, G. (1991) “Critique: No Soul in the New Machine: Technofallacies in the Electronic Monitoring Movement”. Justice Quarterly,
[12]. ELLUL, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: Vintage Books. Farrell, G. (1995). Preventing Repeat Victimization. In Michael Tonry and David P. Farrington, Eds., Building a Safer Society. Crime and Justice, Vol. 19. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[13]. FARRINGTON, D., and WELSH, B. (2005). “Randomized Experiments in Criminology: What Have We Learned in the Last Two Decades? Journal of Experimental Criminology 1:1-29.
[14]. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (2004). FBI Strategic Plan: 2004-2009. Washington, D.C., Federal Bureau of Investigation.
[15]. FELSON, M and CLARKE, R. V (1998). Opportunity makes the thief: Practical theory for Crime Prevention. Police Research Series Paper 98. London: Home Office.
[16]. GANDY, O. (2007). Race and Cumulative Disadvantage: Engaging the Actuarial Assumption (The B. Aubrey Fisher Memorial Lecture, Department of Communication, University of Utah, October 18, 2007).
[17]. GARLAND, D. (2002). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
[18]. GIBBONS, J. and KATZENBACH, N. (2006). Confronting Confinement: A Report of the Commission on Safety and Abuse in America’s Prisons. Vera Institute of Justice, New York, NY.
[19]. GILLIGAN, J. (1996). Violence: Reflections on a National Epidemic. New York: Random House.
[20]. GREENBURG, D. and ROUSH, J. (2009). “The Effectiveness of an electronic security management system in a privately owned apartment complex” Evaluation Review.
[21]. GROFF, E. and MCEWEN, T. (2008). Identifying and measuring the effects of information technologies on law enforcement agencies: The making officer redeployment effective program.
[22]. Washington, D.C U.S. Deapartment of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Programs. HAGGERTY, K. (2008). “Book Review: Evidence-Based Crime Prevention” Theoretical Criminology, p. 121-126. HARRIS, A. and LURIGIO, A. (2007) “Crime Prevention and Soft Technology: Risk Assessment,
[23]. Threat Assessment, and the Prevention of Violence”, in Byrne, J. and Rebovich, D.(2007). The New technology of Crime, Law and Social Control (Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press).