Full Paper View Go Back

Estimation of Biogas Potential of Liquid Manure from Kinetic Models at Different Temperature

Abdulhalim Musa Abubakar1 , Luqman Buba Umdagas2 , Abubakar Yusuf Waziri3 , Ehime Irene Itamah4

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal-Paper
Vol.10 , Issue.2 , pp.46-63, Apr-2022


Online published on Apr 30, 2022


Copyright © Abdulhalim Musa Abubakar, Luqman Buba Umdagas, Abubakar Yusuf Waziri, Ehime Irene Itamah . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library


XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

  • IEEE Citation
  • MLA Citation
  • APA Citation
  • BibTex Citation
  • RIS Citation

IEEE Style Citation: Abdulhalim Musa Abubakar, Luqman Buba Umdagas, Abubakar Yusuf Waziri, Ehime Irene Itamah, “Estimation of Biogas Potential of Liquid Manure from Kinetic Models at Different Temperature,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering, Vol.10, Issue.2, pp.46-63, 2022.

MLA Style Citation: Abdulhalim Musa Abubakar, Luqman Buba Umdagas, Abubakar Yusuf Waziri, Ehime Irene Itamah "Estimation of Biogas Potential of Liquid Manure from Kinetic Models at Different Temperature." International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering 10.2 (2022): 46-63.

APA Style Citation: Abdulhalim Musa Abubakar, Luqman Buba Umdagas, Abubakar Yusuf Waziri, Ehime Irene Itamah, (2022). Estimation of Biogas Potential of Liquid Manure from Kinetic Models at Different Temperature. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering, 10(2), 46-63.

BibTex Style Citation:
@article{Abubakar_2022,
author = {Abdulhalim Musa Abubakar, Luqman Buba Umdagas, Abubakar Yusuf Waziri, Ehime Irene Itamah},
title = {Estimation of Biogas Potential of Liquid Manure from Kinetic Models at Different Temperature},
journal = {International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering},
issue_date = {4 2022},
volume = {10},
Issue = {2},
month = {4},
year = {2022},
issn = {2347-2693},
pages = {46-63},
url = {https://www.isroset.org/journal/IJSRCSE/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=2752},
publisher = {IJCSE, Indore, INDIA},
}

RIS Style Citation:
TY - JOUR
UR - https://www.isroset.org/journal/IJSRCSE/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=2752
TI - Estimation of Biogas Potential of Liquid Manure from Kinetic Models at Different Temperature
T2 - International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering
AU - Abdulhalim Musa Abubakar, Luqman Buba Umdagas, Abubakar Yusuf Waziri, Ehime Irene Itamah
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/04/30
PB - IJCSE, Indore, INDIA
SP - 46-63
IS - 2
VL - 10
SN - 2347-2693
ER -

502 Views    273 Downloads    67 Downloads
  
  

Abstract :
The target when using models to analyse results of biogas yield from manure or similar substrate is mostly to determine their kinetic parameters, which help significantly in knowing the bioreactor behavior and efficiency. This work aims at utilizing experimental biogas data obtained at 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45? to estimate these parameters, including the biogas potential of liquid manure from existing biogas models, first and second order biogas rate equations and the basic arithmetic equations using Excel Solver coupled with POLYMATH by regression. Best models are Cone, Proposed model, Transference, Logistic and Modified Gompertz as they give high coefficient of determination and fits the measured biogas yield data at 25-45?. Estimated biogas potential from Modified Gompertz model ranges from 7143-13584 mL/gVS; Logistic, 6556-12779 mL/gVS; Cone, 7713-14403 mL/gVS and; Transference, 35639-44932 mL/gVS, over the temperature range. The biogas potential parameter is not found in the Proposed model, first and second order biogas rate equations, linear, exponential and polynomial equations but are useful in finding fitted estimates of the empirical data. Most accurate or correct model among the best models obtained here, as per future studies, can be determined using model comparison parameters such as the Bayesian Information Criterion, Akaike’s Information Criterion and F-test.

Key-Words / Index Term :
Biogas, Liquid manure, Digestion temperature, Biogas potential, Kinetic model

References :
[1] L. Miller, Natural insect repellents for leaf-eating insects. Homeguides SFGate, 2018.
[2] N. Duan et al., “Performance evaluation of mesophilic anaerobic digestion of chicken manure with algal digestate,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 1829, pp. 1–11, 2018, doi: 10.3390/en11071829.
[3] A. Abdelhay, L. Al-Hasanat, and A. Albsoul, “Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure and raw algae: Kinetic study and optimization of methane potential by RSM,” Pol. J. Environ. Stud., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 1029–1037, 2021, doi: 10.15244/pjoes/125523.
[4] C. C. Opurum, C. O. Nweke, C. E. Nwanyanwu, and N. A. Nwogu, “Modelling of biphasic biogas production process from mixtures of livestock manure using Bi-logistic Function and Modified Gompertz Equation,” Annu. Res. Rev. Biol., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 116–129, 2021, doi: 10.9734/ARRB/2021/v36i330358.
[5] G. Cayci, C. Temiz, and S. S. Ok, “The effects of fresh and composted chicken manures on some soil characteristics,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–11, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00103624.2017.1373794.
[6] A. M. Abubakar and M. U. Yunus, “Reporting biogas data from various feedstock,” Int. J. Form. Sci. Curr. Futur. Res. Trends, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 23–36, 2021, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6366775.
[7] A. M. Abubakar, K. Silas, and M. M. Aji, “An elaborate breakdown of the essentials of biogas production,” J. Eng. Res. Sci., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 93–118, 2022, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.55708/js0104013.
[8] N. A. Noori and Z. Z. Ismail, “Process optimization of biogas recovery from giant reed (Arundo donax) alternatively pretreated with acid and oxidant agent: Experimental and kinetic study,” Biomass Convers. Biorefinery, pp. 1–15, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00481-7.
[9] M. M. Ali, N. Dia, B. Bilal, and M. Ndongo, “Theoretical models for prediction of methane production from anaerobic digestion: A critical review,” Int. J. Phys. Sci., vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 206–216, 2018, doi: 10.5897/IJPS2018.4740.
[10] M. J. Sukhesh and P. V. Rao, “Synergistic effect in anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and dairy manure- a batch kinetic study,” Energy Sources, Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–12, 2018, doi: 10.1080/15567036.2018.1550536.
[11] B. Selvaraj, S. Krishnasamy, S. Munirajan, S. Alagirisamy, M. Dhanushkodi, and S. Gopalsamy, “Kinetic modelling of augmenting biomethane yield from poultry litter by mitigating ammonia,” Int. J. Green Energy, vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–7, 2018, doi: 10.1080/15435075.2018.1529580.
[12] C. Li, S. Strömberg, G. Liub, I. A. Nges, and J. Liu, “Assessment of regional biomass as co-substrate in the anaerobic digestion of chicken manure: Impact of co-digestion with chicken processing waste, seagrass and Miscanthus,” Biochem. Eng. J., pp. 1–38, 2016, doi: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.bej.2016.11.008.
[13] I. Zeb et al., “Kinetic and microbial analysis of methane production from dairy wastewater anaerobic digester under ammonia and salinity stresses,” pp. 1–36, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619303221.
[14] C. González-figueredo, R. A. Flores-estrella, and O. A. Rojas-rejón, “Fermentation: Metabolism, kinetic models, and bioprocessing,” in Current Topics in Biochemical Engineering, InTech Open, 2018, pp. 1–17.
[15] Y. F. Lim et al., “Evaluation of potential feedstock for biogas production via anaerobic digestion in Malaysia: Kinetic studies and economics analysis,” Environ. Technol., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–18, 2021, doi: 10.1080/09593330.2021.1882587.
[16] D. Pecar, F. Pohleven, and A. Goršek, “Kinetics of methane production during anaerobic fermentation of chicken manure with sawdust and fungi pre-treated wheat straw,” Waste Manag., vol. 102, pp. 170–178, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.046.
[17] A. H. Ulukardesler, “Anaerobic co-digestion of grass and cow manure: Kinetic modeling comparison and GHG emission reduction,” Res. Sq., pp. 1–15, 2021.
[18] L. Delgadillo-Mirquez, M. Hernández-sarabia, and M. Machado-Higuera, “Mathematical modelling and simulation for biogas production from organic waste,” Int. J. Eng. Syst. Model. Simul., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 97–102, 2018.
[19] M. Hassan, M. Umar, W. Ding, and E. Mehryar, “Methane enhancement through co-digestion of chicken manure and oxidative cleaved wheat straw: Stability performance and kinetic modeling perspectives,” Energy, vol. 141, pp. 2314–2320, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.110.
[20] A. I. Parralejo, L. Royano, J. González, and J. F. González, “Industrial Crops & Products Small scale biogas production with animal excrement and agricultural residues,” Ind. Crop. Prod., vol. 131, pp. 307–314, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.01.059.
[21] C. Zhao et al., “Bio-energy conversion performance, biodegradability, and kinetic analysis of different fruit residues during discontinuous anaerobic digestion,” Waste Manag., vol. 52, pp. 295–297, 2016, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.028.
[22] H. Yang, R. Deng, J. Jin, Y. Wu, X. Jiang, and J. Shi, “Hydrolytic performances of different organic compounds in different lignocellulosic biomass during anaerobic digestion,” Environ. Eng. Resour., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2021.013.
[23] A. M. Abubakar, “Biodigester and feedstock type: Characteristic, selection, and global biogas production,” J. Eng. Res. Sci., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 170–187, 2022, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.55708/js0103018
[24] B. Deepanraj, V. Sivasubramanian, and S. Jayaraj, “Experimental and kinetic study on anaerobic co-digestion of poultry manure and food waste,” Desalin. Water Treat., vol. 59, pp. 72–76, 2017, doi: 10.5004/dwt.2016.0162.
[25] P. Li, W. Li, M. Sun, X. Xu, B. Zhang, and Y. Sun, “Evaluation of biochemical methane potential and kinetics on the anaerobic digestion of vegetable crop residues,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 26, pp. 1–14, 2019, doi: 10.3390/en12010026.
[26] Y. Wei, H. Yuan, A. C. Wachemo, and X. Li, “Impacts of modification of corn stover on the synergistic effect and microbial community structure of co-digestion with chicken manure,” Energy & Fuels, p. A-K, 2019, doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02785.
[27] Y. Li, R. Zhang, C. Chen, G. Liu, Y. He, and X. Liu, “Biogas production from co-digestion of corn stover and chicken manure under anaerobic wet, hemi-solid, and solid state conditions,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 149, pp. 406–412, 2013, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.091.
[28] D. P. Van, G. H. Minh, S. T. P. Phu, and T. Fujiwara, “A new kinetic model for biogas production from co-digestion by batch mode,” Glob. J. Environ. Sci. Manag., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 251–262, 2018, doi: 10.22034/gjesm.2018.03.001.
[29] T. Keskin, K. Arslan, D. Karaalp, and N. Azbar, “The determination of the trace element effects on basal medium by using the statistical optimization approach for biogas production from chicken manure,” Waste and Biomass Valorization, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–10, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s12649-018-0273-2.
[30] A. Haryanto, S. Triyono, and N. H. Wicaksono, “Effect of hydraulic retention time on biogas production from cow dung in a semi continuous anaerobic digester,” Int. J. Renew. Energy Dev., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 93–100, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.7.2.93-100.
[31] A. Gallipoli, C. M. Braguglia, A. Gianico, D. Montecchio, and P. Pagliaccia, “Kitchen waste valorization through a mild-temperature pretreatment to enhance biogas production and fermentability: Kinetics study in mesophilic and thermophilic regime,” J. Environ. Sci., vol. 89, pp. 167–179, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2019.10.016.
[32] C. C. Opurum, “Kinetic study on biogas production from cabbage (Brassica oleracea) waste and its blend with animal manure using Logistic Function Model,” J. Adv. Microbiol., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 34–43, 2021, doi: 10.9734/JAMB/2021/v21i130317.
[33] N. Kyurkchiev, S. Markov, and A. Iliev, “A note on the Schnute growth model,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 47–54, 2016.
[34] J. Shen, C. Zhao, Y. Liu, R. Zhang, G. Liu, and C. Chen, “Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of durian shell with chicken, dairy, and pig manures,” Energy Convers. Manag., pp. 1–10, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.099.
[35] H. Jiang et al., “Solid-state anaerobic digestion of chicken manure and corn straw with different loading amounts,” Polish J. Environ. Stud., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 2117–2125, 2021, doi: 10.15244/pjoes/124180.
[36] X. Wang and A. Ma, “Comparison of four nonlinear growth models for effective exploration of growth characteristics of turbot Scophthalmus maximus fish strain,” African J. Biotechnol., vol. 15, no. 40, pp. 2251–2258, 2016, doi: 10.5897/AJB2016.15490.
[37] R. Venkateshkumar, S. Shanmugam, and A. R. Veerappan, “Anaerobic co-digestion of cow dung and cotton seed hull with different blend ratio: Experimental and kinetic study,” Biomass Convers. Biorefinery, pp. 1–111, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01006-3.
[38] K. Paritosh, S. Mathur, N. Pareek, and V. Vivekanand, “Feasibility study of waste (d) potential: co-digestion of organic wastes, synergistic effect and kinetics of biogas production,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., pp. 1–10, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s13762-017-1453-5.
[39] J. Szlachta, H. Prask, M. Fugol, and A. Luberanski, “Effect of mechanical pre-treatment of the agricultural substrates on yield of biogas and kinetics of anaerobic digestion,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 3669, pp. 1–16, 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10103669.
[40] S. Jijai and C. Siripatana, “Kinetic model of biogas production from of Thai rice noodle wastewater (Khanomjeen) with chicken manure,” Energy Procedia, vol. 138, pp. 386–392, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.177.
[41] I. Syaichurrozi, S. Suhirman, and T. Hidayat, “Effect of initial pH on anaerobic co-digestion of Salvinia molesta and rice straw for biogas production and kinetics,” Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., pp. 1–33, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2018.10.007.
[42] M. Das Ghatak and P. Mahanta, “Comparison of kinetic models for biogas production rate from saw dust,” Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol., pp. 248–254, 2014.
[43] G. K. Latinwo and S. E. Agarry, “Modelling the kinetics of biogas production from mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of cow dung with plantain peels,” Int. J. Renewab;e Energy Dev., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 55–63, 2015, doi: 10.14710/ijred.4.1.55-63.
[44] M. I. Alfa et al., “Evaluation of biogas yield and kinetics from the anaerobic co-digestion of cow dung and horse dung: A strategy for sustainable management of livestock manure,” Energy, Ecol. Environ., pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40974-020-00203-0.
[45] F. Arifan, A. Abdullah, and S. Sumardiono, “Kinetic study of biogas production from animal manure and organic waste in Semarang City by using anaerobic digestion method,” Indones. J. Chem., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1221–1230, 2021, doi: 10.22146/ijc.65056.
[46] M. Abid, J. Wu, M. Seyedsalehi, Y. Hu, and G. Tian, “Novel insights of impacts of solid content on high solid anaerobic digestion of cow manure: Kinetics and microbial community dynamics,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 333, no. 125205, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125205.
[47] J. Ma et al., “Improving anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under optimized biochar supplementation strategies,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 325, no. 124697, p. 124697, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124697.
[48] J. Kainthola, A. S. Kalamdhad, and V. V Goud, “A review on enhanced biogas production from anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass by different enhancement techniques,” Process Biochem., vol. 84, pp. 81–90, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2019.05.023.
[49] Z. Hongguang, Y. Jing, and C. Xiaowei, “Application of Modified Gompertz Model to Study on Biogas production from middle temperature co-digestion of pig manure and dead pigs,” vol. 03022, 2019.
[50] B. Deepanraj, V. Sivasubramanian, and S. Jayaraj, “Kinetic study on the effect of temperature on biogas production using a lab scale batch reactor,” Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., pp. 1–5, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.04.051.
[51] S. Liu, “How cells grow,” in Bioprocess Engineering: Kinetics, Sustainability, and Reactor Design, 2nd ed., Elsevier B. V, 2017, pp. 629–697.
[52] Y. Pererva, C. D. Miller, and R. C. Sims, “Existing empirical kinetic models in biochemical methane potential (BMP) testing, their selection and numerical solution,” Water, vol. 12, no. 1831, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.3390/w12061831.
[53] M. Thakur, Regression analysis formula. Wall Street Mojo, 2021.
[54] M. A. Zaid, Correlation and regression analysis. Ankara, Turkey: Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), 2015.
[55] A. Gallo, “A refresher on regression analysis,” Harvard Business Review, 2014. https://www.google.com/amp/s/hbr.org/amp/2015/11/a-refresher-on-regression-analysis (accessed Jul. 16, 2021).
[56] B. Beers, “Regression definition,” Dotdash, vol. 1, pp. 1–2, 2021, Accessed: Sep. 18, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/regression.asp.
[57] P. Ciborowski, “Anaerobic digestion of livestock manure from pollution control and energy production: A feasibility assessment,” Pollut. Control, p. 233, 2001.
[58] J. Liebetrau et al., Potential and utilization of manure to generate biogas in seven countries. IEA Bioenergy Task 37, 2021.
[59] H. Mohammed, F. F. Ahmad, and A. N. Adedeji, Effect of insurgency on catale markets in Northeast Nigeria: Appraisal of Kasuwan Shanu Cattle Market, Maiduguri, Borno state, vol. 8, no. 5. 2020.
[60] S. Abdulsalam and M. Umar, “A kinetic study of biogas produced from cow and elephant dungs using the residual substrate concentration approach,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 7–11, 2015, doi: 10.12691/ces-3-1-2.
[61] A. H. Ulukarde?ler and F. S. Atalay, “Kinetic studies of biogas generation using chicken manure as feedstock,” J. Polytech., vol. 0900, no. 4, pp. 913–917, 2018, doi: 10.2339/politeknik.389622.
[62] F. Arifan, A. Abdullah, and S. Sumardiono, “Effect of organic waste addition into animal manure on biogas production using anaerobic digestion method,” Int. J. Renew. Energy Dev., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 623–633, 2021.
[63] J. Zhang et al., “Enhancing biogas production from livestock manure in solid-state anaerobic digestion by sorghum-vinegar residues,” Environ. Technol. Innov., vol. 26, no. 102276, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102276.
[64] F. Tufaner and Y. Avsar, Effect of co-substrate on biogas production from cattle manure: A review, vol. 13. Springer, 2016.
[65] L. M. Shitophyta, A. Salsabila, F. Anggraini, and S. Jamilatun, “Development of kinetic models for biogas production from tofu liquid waste,” Elkawnie J. Islam. Sci. Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 107–118, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.22373/ekw.v7i1.8296.
[66] K. Fakkaew and C. Polprasert, “Air stripping pre-treatment process to enhance biogas production in anaerobic digestion of chicken manure wastewater,” Bioresour. Technol. Reports, vol. 14, no. 100647, pp. 1–7, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100647.
[67] P. Eronmosele, A. E. Thelma, and A. I. Essienubong, “Comparative study of the kinetics of biogas yield from the codigestion of poultry droppings with waterleaf and poultry droppings with elephant grass,” Eng. Sci., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 139–150, 2020, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12739/NWSA.2020.15.3.1A0457.
[68] R. M. Faraz, “A preliminary study: Effect of initial pH and Saccharomyces cerevisiae addition on biogas production from acid-pretreated Salvinia molesta and kinetics,” Energy, p. 118226, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118226.
[69] X. Y. Liu, J. J. Wang, J. M. Nie, N. Wu, F. Yang, and R. J. Yang, “Biogas production of chicken manure by two-stage fermentation process,” in E3S Web of Conferences (ICEMEE 2018), 2018, vol. 38, no. 01048, pp. 5–8, doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183801048.
[70] S. Achinas and G. J. W. Euverink, “Elevated biogas production from the anaerobic co-digestion of farmhouse waste: Insight into the process performance and kinetics,” Waste Manag. Res., vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1240–1249, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0734242X19873383.
[71] S. Zahedi, C. Mart, R. Solera, and M. Perez, “Evaluating the effectiveness of adding chicken manure in the anaerobic mesophilic codigestion of sewage sludge and wine distillery wastewater: Kinetic modeling and economic approach,” Energy & Fuels, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01852.
[72] T. Nasrin, C. Kumer, R. Nandi, S. Huda, and M. Alam, “Kinetic study and optimization of total solids for anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste: Bangladesh perspective,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1136–1145, 2021, doi: 10.2166/wst.2021.291.
[73] E. K. Tetteh and S. Rathilal, “Kinetics and nanoparticle catalytic enhancement of biogas production from wastewater using a magnetized biochemical methane potential (MBMP) system,” Catalysts, vol. 10, no. 1200, pp. 1–19, 2020, doi: 10.3390/catal10101200.
[74] D. Tazdait, N. Abdi, H. Grib, H. Lounici, A. Pauss, and N. Mameri, “Comparison of different models of substrate inhibition in aerobic batch biodegradation of malathion,” Turkish J. Eng. Environ. Sci., vol. 37, pp. 221–230, 2013, doi: 10.3906/muh-1211-7.
[75] T. R. T. Yusof, N. Abdul Rahman, A. B. Ariff, and H. C. Man, “Evaluation of hydrogen and methane production from co-digestion of chicken manure and food waste,” Polish J. Environ. Stud., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1–11, 2019, doi: 10.15244/pjoes/86222.
[76] P. Rani, M. Bansal, V. V Pathak, and S. Ahmad, Experimental and kinetic studies on co-digestion of agrifood and sewage sludge for biogas production, vol. 16, no. 1. Taylor and Francis Group, 2022.
[77] A. M. Abubakar, B. Iliyasu, and Z. M. Sarkinbaka, “Detailed overview on POLYMATH software for chemical engineering analysis,” J. Eng. Res. Sci., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 133–147, 2022, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.55708/js0103014
[78] Fhooe, Biogas temperature optimization. Fhooe, 2021.
[79] L. M. Shitophyta and Maryudi, “Comparison of kinetic model for biogas production from corn cob,” in IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/345/1/012004.
[80] K. Nwosu-obieogu, F. O. Aguele, A. Onyenwoke, and K. Adekunle, “Kinetic model comparison for biogas production from poultry manure and banana peels,” Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/7595 ARTICLE.
[81] T. H. L. Silva, L. A. dos Santos, C. R. de Melo Oliveira, T. S. Porto, J. F. T. Juca, and A. Fe. de S. Santos, “Determination of methane generation potential and evaluation of kinetic models in poultry wastes,” Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., vol. 32, no. 101936, pp. 1–8, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2021.101936.
[82] D. Pecar and A. Gorsek, “Kinetics of methane production during anaerobic digestion of chicken manure with sawdust and miscanthus,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 143, no. 105820, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105820.
[83] A. K. Amogha, “Wireless transmission of solar generated power,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Netw. Secur. Commun., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 13–15, 2020.
[84] D. G. Anand, K. L. Niharika, Shrikala, L. Sunanda, and M. Varsha, “The development of innovative hybrid stove with solar and biogas for rural area,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 25–28, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v9i6.2538.
[85] A. Mukhtar, B. Z. Abdulkarim, and T. A. Ladan, “Socio-economic benefits of livestock rearing in Maiduguri metropolis, Borno State, Nigeria,” IOSR J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 16–23, 2021, doi: 10.9790/0837-2601031623.
[86] A. Mukhtar, B. Z. Abdulkarim, and T. A. Ladan, “Cost and economic benefits of livestock rearing in Maiduguri Metropolis, Borno state, Nigeria,” Res. Journali, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2021, [Online]. Available: www.researchjournali.com.
[87] M. I. Francis, J. W. Liba, N. N. Atsanda, and R. Jukunda, “Level of awareness of poultry diseases and management practices by poultry farmers in Maiduguri metropolis, Borno State, Nigeria,” Niger. Vet. J., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 230–235, 2016.
[88] H. Tijjani, B. A. Tijani, A. N. Tijjani, and M. A. Sadiq, “Economic analysis of poultry egg production in Maiduguri and environs of Borno State, Nigeria,” Sch. J. Agric. Sci., vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 319–324, 2012.

Authorization Required

 

You do not have rights to view the full text article.
Please contact administration for subscription to Journal or individual article.
Mail us at  support@isroset.org or view contact page for more details.

Go to Navigation