Software Fault Detection Using Improved Relief Detection Method

M. Karanam¹ , L. Gottemukkala²

Section:Review Paper, Product Type: Isroset-Journal
Vol.4 , Issue.5 , pp.1-4, Oct-2016

Online published on Oct 28, 2016

Copyright © M. Karanam, L. Gottemukkala . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

Abstract :
Fault-prone quests conjecture is probably the majority of conventional in addition to crucial parts within computer software executive. Diagnosis associated with fault-prone quests may be extensively analyzed. A large number of scientific tests used some kind of computer software metrics, including system complexity, size associated with quests, or even object-oriented metrics, in addition to created statistical versions to analyze fault-proneness. Machine-learning approaches are already popular with regard to fault-proneness discovery. Advantages of machine mastering app roaches induce the growth associated with brand-new computer software metrics with respect to fault-prone element discovery. Keeping in mind the end goal to crush, another parameter named remaining fault rate can be displayed. This paper proposes another calculation named improved relief fault detection. The exploratory results give better results as far as exactness than existing system alleviation calculation.

Key-Words / Index Term :
Software; Object Oriented Program; Code; Classifier

References :
[1] B. Kitchenham, “Whats up with software metrics? A preliminary mapping study”, Journal of Systems and Software, Vol.83, pp. 37–51, 2019.
[2] C. Catal, B. Diri, “A systematic review of software fault prediction studies”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.36, pp.7346–7354, 2009.
[3] C. Catal, “Software fault prediction: a literature review and current trends”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.38, pp.4626–4636, 2011.
[4] T. Hall, S. Beecham, D. Bowes, D. Gray, S. Counsell, “A systematic literature review on fault prediction performance in software engineering”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. Vol.38, Issue.6, pp. 1276-1304, 2012.
[5] J. Ratzinger, M. Pinzger, H. Gall, “EQ-Mine: predicting short-term defects for software evolution”, Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, Vol.4422, pp12–26, 2007.
[6] E. Arisholm, L.C. Briand, E.B. Johannessen, “A systematic and comprehensive investigation of methods to build and evaluate fault prediction models”, Journal of Systems and Software, Vol.83, pp.2-17, 2010.
[7] Baljinder Ghotra, Shane McIntosh, Ahmed E. Hassan , “Revisiting the Impact of Classification Techniques on the Performance of Defect Prediction Models”, Software Analysis and Intelligence Lab (SAIL) School of Computing, Queen’s University, Canada , pp.231-144. 2014.
[8] R. Mahajan, SK. Gupta, RK Bedi, “comparison of various approaches of software fault prediction: a review”, international journal of Advanced Technology & Engineering Research, Vol.4, Issue.4, pp.13-16, 2014.
[9] PK. Singh, RK. Panda, OP. Sangwan , “A Critical Analysis on Software Fault Prediction Techniques”, World Applied Sciences Journal, Vol.33, Issue.3, pp. 371-379, 2015.
[10] NK. Rao, RM. Reddy, BK. Rao., "Defect Prediction in Software Entities Classified in Terms of Level Dependencies", International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering, Vol.1, Issue1, pp.20-25, 2013.