Full Paper View Go Back

RPL Protocol Load balancing Schemes in Low-Power and Lossy Networks

Poorana Senthilkumar S.1 , Subramani B.2

  1. Department of Computer Applications, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
  2. SNMV College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Section:Review Paper, Product Type: Journal-Paper
Vol.11 , Issue.1 , pp.7-13, Feb-2023


Online published on Feb 28, 2023


Copyright © Poorana Senthilkumar S., Subramani B. . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library


XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

  • IEEE Citation
  • MLA Citation
  • APA Citation
  • BibTex Citation
  • RIS Citation

IEEE Style Citation: Poorana Senthilkumar S., Subramani B., “RPL Protocol Load balancing Schemes in Low-Power and Lossy Networks,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering, Vol.11, Issue.1, pp.7-13, 2023.

MLA Style Citation: Poorana Senthilkumar S., Subramani B. "RPL Protocol Load balancing Schemes in Low-Power and Lossy Networks." International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering 11.1 (2023): 7-13.

APA Style Citation: Poorana Senthilkumar S., Subramani B., (2023). RPL Protocol Load balancing Schemes in Low-Power and Lossy Networks. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering, 11(1), 7-13.

BibTex Style Citation:
@article{S._2023,
author = {Poorana Senthilkumar S., Subramani B.},
title = {RPL Protocol Load balancing Schemes in Low-Power and Lossy Networks},
journal = {International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering},
issue_date = {2 2023},
volume = {11},
Issue = {1},
month = {2},
year = {2023},
issn = {2347-2693},
pages = {7-13},
url = {https://www.isroset.org/journal/IJSRCSE/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=3045},
publisher = {IJCSE, Indore, INDIA},
}

RIS Style Citation:
TY - JOUR
UR - https://www.isroset.org/journal/IJSRCSE/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=3045
TI - RPL Protocol Load balancing Schemes in Low-Power and Lossy Networks
T2 - International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering
AU - Poorana Senthilkumar S., Subramani B.
PY - 2023
DA - 2023/02/28
PB - IJCSE, Indore, INDIA
SP - 7-13
IS - 1
VL - 11
SN - 2347-2693
ER -

142 Views    173 Downloads    31 Downloads
  
  

Abstract :
The Routing Protocol for Low-power and Lossy Networks (RPL) is the most crucial in the Internet of Things (IoT) for the routing process. The RPL protocol is proposed by the Internet-Engineering Task-Force (IETF)-Routing over low-power and lossy-networks (ROLL) working group for IoT environments routing service. RPL has been improved for a wide range of IoT application scenarios and environments. One of the primary reasons for RPL improvement is load balancing. In Low-Power and Lossy Networks (LLNs), the load balancing can even degrade network performance and node lifetime. In this article, contains the RPL enhanced schemes offered for the load balancing, for IoT/LLNs, and explores future research options.

Key-Words / Index Term :
IoT, LLNs, RPL, Routing, node, Load balancing

References :
[1] J. Santosa and G. Kurniawan, “IOT BASED LOW-COST PLATFORM FOR SMART ORNAMENTAL PLANT MONITORING SYSTEM,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 99, no. 24, pp. 6102–6117, 2021.
[2] P. Sethi and S. R. Sarangi, “Internet of Things: Architectures, Protocols, and Applications,” J. Electr. Comput. Eng., vol. 2017, pp. 1–25, 2017, doi: 10.1155/2017/9324035.
[3] N. H. Motlagh, M. Mohammadrezaei, J. Hunt, and B. Zakeri, “Internet of things (IoT) and the energy sector,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 2. MDPI AG, 2020. doi: 10.3390/en13020494.
[4] S. Dhingra, R. B. Madda, A. H. Gandomi, R. Patan, and M. Daneshmand, “Internet of Things Mobile–Air Pollution Monitoring System (IoT-Mobair),” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 5577–5584, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2903821.
[5] A. Osorio, M. Calle, J. D. Soto, and J. E. Candelo-Becerra, “Routing in LoRaWAN: Overview and Challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 72–76, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.001.2000053.
[6] J. G. Ko, A. Terzis, S. Dawson-Haggerty, D. Culler, J. Hui, and P. Levis, “Connecting low-power and lossy networks to the internet,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 96–101, 2011, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2011.5741163.
[7] A. Verma and V. Ranga, “Security of RPL Based 6LoWPAN Networks in the Internet of Things: A Review,” IEEE Sens. J., vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 5666–5690, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2020.2973677.
[8] E. K. Pister, E. C. S. S. D. S. P. Thubert, and T. Phinney, “Industrial Routing Requirements in Low-Power and Lossy Networks,” IETF Network Working Networks, Request for Comments: 5673, 2009. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5673 (accessed Jan. 02, 2023).
[9] J. Buron, A. Brandt, and G. Porcu, “Home Automation Routing Requirements in Low-Power and Lossy Networks,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 5826, 2010. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5826 (accessed Jan. 02, 2023).
[10] D. B. M. Dohler, T. Watteyne, T. Winter, “Routing Requirements for Urban Low-Power and Lossy Networks,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), 2009. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5548 (accessed Jan. 02, 2023).
[11] O. Iova, P. Picco, T. Istomin, and C. Kiraly, “RPL: The Routing Standard for the Internet of Things... Or Is It?,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 16–22, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2016.1600397CM.
[12] H.-S. Kim, J. Ko, D. E. Culler, and J. Paek, “Challenging the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL): A Survey,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2502–2525, 2017, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2017.2751617.
[13] H. Bello-Salau, A. M. Aibinu, Z. Wang, A. J. Onumanyi, E. N. Onwuka, and J. J. Dukiya, “An optimized routing algorithm for vehicle ad-hoc networks,” Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J., no. xxxx, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2019.01.016.
[14] P. O. Kamgueu, E. Nataf, and T. D. Ndie, “Survey on RPL enhancements: A focus on topology, security and mobility,” Comput. Commun., vol. 120, no. July 2017, pp. 10–21, May 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2018.02.011.
[15] Poorana Senthil Kumar S Subramani B, “Evolutions of Low power and Lossy Networks Protocols in the Internet of Things: Review,” ITEE J. Inf. Technol. Electr. Eng., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://www.iteejournal.org/Archive_june_2022.php
[16] A. P. Anagha Jadhav, Sudarshan Dutonde, Archana Todarmal, “IoT Based Biometric Attendance System for Smart Classroom,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 58–57, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.isroset.org/journal/IJSRCSE/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=2007
[17] H. F. GATETE Marcel, “Routing In Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks Coupled With IoT Technologies- A Review,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 49–60, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.isroset.org/pdf_paper_view.php?paper_id=3000&6-ISROSET-IJSRCSE-08170-63.pdf
[18] N. Nasser, L. Karim, A. Ali, M. Anan, and N. Khelifi, “Routing in the Internet of Things,” in GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference, Dec. 2017, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2017.8253955.
[19] M. M. Martín-Lopo, J. Boal, and Á. Sánchez-Miralles, “A literature review of IoT energy platforms aimed at end users,” Comput. Networks, vol. 171, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107101.
[20] S. A. Fatemifar and R. Javidan, “A new load balancing clustering method for the RPL protocol,” Telecommun. Syst., vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 297–315, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11235-021-00760-7.
[21] B. Djamaa, M. R. Senouci, H. Bessas, B. Dahmane, and A. Mellouk, “Efficient and Stateless P2P Routing Mechanisms for the Internet of Things,” IEEE Internet Things J., 2021, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3053339.
[22] T. Winter et al., “RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), pp. 1–157, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc6550.pdf
[23] E. C. S. P. Thubert, “Objective Function Zero for the Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL),” Internet Eng. Task Force, pp. 1–14, [Online]. Available: http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6552
[24] P. L. Gnawali, O, “The Minimum Rank with Hysteresis Objective Function,” Internet Eng. Task Force, vol. 1, pp. 1–13, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/pdfrfc/rfc6719.txt.pdf
[25] R. Masadeh, B. AlSaaidah, E. Masadeh, M. R. Al-Hadidi, and O. Almomani, “Elastic Hop Count Trickle Timer Algorithm in Internet of Things,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 19, pp. 1–19, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su141912417.
[26] P. Levis, T. H. Clausen, J. W. Hui, O. Gnawali, and J. Ko, “The Trickle Algorithm,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6206, 2011. https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6206 (accessed Jan. 02, 2023).
[27] A. S. Kassab, K. G. Seddik, A. Elezabi, and A. Soltan, “Realistic Wireless Smart-Meter Network Optimization Using Composite RPL Metric,” 8th IEEE Int. Conf. Smart Grid, pp. 109–114, 2020.
[28] Z. Magubane, P. Tarwireyi, A. Abu-Mafouz, and M. Adigun, “Extended Context-Aware and Load Balancing Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks in IoT networks (ECLRPL),” in 2021 3rd International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference (IMITEC), Nov. 2021, no. February 2022, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1109/IMITEC52926.2021.9714710.
[29] J. V. V. Sobral, J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, R. A. L. Rabêlo, J. Al-Muhtadi, and V. Korotaev, “Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks in Internet of Things Applications,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 9, p. 2144, May 2019, doi: 10.3390/s19092144.
[30] M. N. Moghadam and H. Taheri, “High throughput load balanced multipath routing in homogeneous wireless sensor networks,” in 2014 22nd Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), May 2014, no. Icee, pp. 1516–1521. doi: 10.1109/IranianCEE.2014.6999775.
[31] O. Iova, F. Theoleyre, and T. Noel, “Exploiting multiple parents in RPL to improve both the network lifetime and its stability,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Jun. 2015, vol. 2015-Septe, pp. 610–616. doi: 10.1109/ICC.2015.7248389.
[32] H.-S. Kim, J. Paek, and S. Bahk, “QU-RPL: Queue utilization based RPL for load balancing in large scale industrial applications,” in 2015 12th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON), Jun. 2015, pp. 265–273. doi: 10.1109/SAHCN.2015.7338325.
[33] Xinxin Liu, Jianlin Guo, G. Bhatti, P. Orlik, and K. Parsons, “Load balanced routing for low power and lossy networks,” in 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Apr. 2013, pp. 2238–2243. doi: 10.1109/WCNC.2013.6554908.
[34] H.-S. Kim, J. Paek, D. E. Culler, and S. Bahk, “Do Not Lose Bandwidth: Adaptive Transmission Power and Multihop Topology Control,” in 2017 13th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS), Jun. 2017, vol.2018-Janua, pp.99–108. doi: 10.1109/DCOSS.2017.23.
[35] P. Di Marco, G. Athanasiou, P.-V. Mekikis, and C. Fischione, “MAC-aware routing metrics for the internet of things,” Comput. Commun., vol.74, pp.77–86, Jan.2016, doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2015.05.010.

Authorization Required

 

You do not have rights to view the full text article.
Please contact administration for subscription to Journal or individual article.
Mail us at  support@isroset.org or view contact page for more details.

Go to Navigation