Investigation of Manual and Automation Testing using Assorted Approaches

Shruti Malve¹ , Pradeep Sharma²

1. Dept. of Computer Science, Govt. Holkar Science (Autonomous) College, Indore, India.
2. Dept. of Computer Science, Govt. Holkar Science (Autonomous) College, Indore, India.

Correspondence should be addressed to: shrutimalve.cs@gmail.com.

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Isroset-Journal
Vol.5 , Issue.2 , pp.81-87, Apr-2017

Online published on Apr 30, 2017

Copyright © Shruti Malve, Pradeep Sharma . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

1017 Views    416 Downloads    182 Downloads

Abstract :
Testing means “revealing a person`s capabilities by putting them under strain; challenging”. Software testing exist a vast domain, but it may be classify into two way: manual testing and automated testing. In manual testing, test cases are executed (run) manually without any help from tools/scripts, but with automated testing, test cases are executed (run) with the help of tools, scripts, and software. Software testing is expensive, labor intensive and consume more time in a software development life cycle. There was forever a need in software testing to decrease the testing time. The type of testing (manual or automated) depends on various factors, adding project need, budget, timeline, expertise, and suitability. Three fundamental factors of any project are of course time, cost, and quality – the objective of any successful project is to diminish the cost and time required to complete it successfully while maintaining quality output. When it comes to testing, one type may accomplish this goal better than the other. This paper presents the concept of automation and manual testing and problem with manual testing and benefit of automatic testing. The main objective of this paper is to conduct a comparative study of Manual and Automation testing Method based on Accuracy, Bug detection, Efforts, cost and Time.

Key-Words / Index Term :
Software Testing, Manual Testing, Automation Testing

References :
[1] Harpreet Kaur, Dr.Gagan Gupta. “Comparative Study of Automated Testing Tools: Selenium, Quick Test Professional and Testcomplete”. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, vol, 3(5), pp.1739-1743, 2013,
[2] Vishawjyoti, Sachin Sharma. “STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF AUTOMATION TESTING TECHNIQUES”. Journal of Global Research in Computer Science, Vol 3(12), 2012.
[3] VIVEK KUMAR. “COMPARISON OF MANUAL AND AUTOMATION TESTING”. International Journal of Research in Science And Technology, Vol. 1(V), 2012.
[4] Antawan Holmes and Marc Kellogg. “Automating Functional Tests Using Selenium”. Proceedings of AGILE 2006 Conference (AGILE`06), 2006,ISBN : 0-7695-2562-8/06 $20.00 IEEE.
[5] R. M. Sharma.” Quantitative Analysis of Automation and Manual Testing.” International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT), Vol. 4(1), 2014.
[6]Er. Rajender Bathla, Er. Shallu Bathla. “Innovative Approaches of Automated tools in Software testing & current technology as compared to Manual testing ”. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, Vol-1(1) , 2009.
[7] Bc. Dávid Chmurcˇiak. “Automation of regression testing of web applications.” DIPLOMA THESIS, MASARYK UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF INFORMATICS , Brno, spring 2013.
[8] Shaveta, Sachin kumar, Nitika, Snehlata. “Comparative Study of Automated Testing Tools: Quick Test Pro and Load Runner”. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 3 (4) , 2012.
[9] Sami Torniainen. “IMPROVING EFFECTIVENESS OF REGRESSION TESTING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM SOFTWARE.” Master of Science thesis, HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, February 25th 2008.
[10] Sunil L. Bangare, Seema Borse, Pallavi S. Bangare, Shital Nandedkar “Automated Api Testing Approach ” Stes’s Sinhgad Academy Of Engineering, Pune-48, Maharashtra India.
[11] Andreas Leitner, Ilinca Ciupa, Bertrand Meyer, Mark Howard “Reconciling Manual and Automated Testing: the AutoTest Experience”. ETH Zurich CH-8092 Zürich, AXA Rosenberg Investment Management LLC Orinda, California 94563.
[12] Jagdish Singh, Monika Sharma.” A Comprehensive Review of Web-based Automation Testing Tools”. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, Vol. 3(10), October 2015
[13] Prof. (Dr.) V. N. MAURYA , Er. RAJENDER KUMAR . “Analytical Study on Manual vs. Automated Testing Using with Simplistic Cost Model ”. International Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, vol .2 (1), 2012.
[14] Joe Fernandes (Oracle) Alex Di Fonzo (Synchronoss Technologies “When to Automate Your Testing (and When Not To)”.oracle 30 year.
[15] DAYU GUAN (Steven). ”Manual to Automated Testing.” Master of Information Management thesis, Victoria Business School, Victoria University of Wellington, October 2014.
[16] Linda G. Hayes. The Automated Testing Handbook.
[17] Amit Srivastava. ” Test Automation and Software Development.” TATA Research development and design center, December 2002.
[18] Dudekula Mohammad Rafi, Katam Reddy Kiran Moses, Kai Petersen, Mika V. M¨antyl¨.” Benefit and Limitations of Automated Software Testing”. Systematic Literature Review and Practitioner Survey, Sweden.
[19] Dr. Mike Bartley,” Achieving business benefits through automated software testing”, Founder and CEO, TVS (mike@testandverification.com)
[20] Douglas Hoffman. “Test Automation Architectures: Planning for Test Automation” 24646 Heather Heights Place Saratoga, California 95070-9710, 1999.
[21] David Wayne Jansing .”Enhancing the Effectiveness of Software Test Automation.” Master of Science thesis, University of New York Polytechnic Institute Utica, New York, December 2015.
[22]Smart Bear Software,” Manual Tester’s Guide to Automated Testing” Inc. 100 Cummings Center, Suite 234N Beverly, 2013.