Satisfaction Level of SHS Students to the Overall Performance of Elpidio Quirino High School in the New Normal

Edgardo Q. Lariosa¹ , Karen Faith Garcia²

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal-Paper
Vol.8 , Issue.4 , pp.42-46, Apr-2022

Online published on Apr 30, 2022

Copyright © Edgardo Q. Lariosa, Karen Faith Garcia . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

Abstract :
This study aimed to determine the satisfaction level of SHS students with the overall performance of Elpidio Quirino High School in the new normal. The result of the study used as the basis for the development and improvement of Elpidio Quirino High School in the next phase. The researchers used the descriptive quantitative data analysis and used purposive sampling method in the study. The findings revealed that the satisfaction level of SHS students of Elpidio Quirino High in terms of teachers teaching strategies and techniques got a mean of 4.46 (SD=0.55) which is verbally interpreted as “Somewhat Satisfied”. The satisfaction level on the administration management got a mean of score 4.36 (SD=0.62) which is interpreted as “Somewhat Satisfied”. The two Indicators received a “Somewhat Satisfied” interpretation. Therefore, it recommends that the teachers and administration must take necessary action to give satisfaction to their students. The study also shows that there is no significant difference in the satisfaction level of the student to the overall performance of the Elpidio Quirino High School in terms of their grade level at z=1.96 (p=0.336) and track at z=1.96 (p=0.569).

Key-Words / Index Term :
level of satisfaction, administration management, new normal, teaching strategies

References :
[1] I. Weerasinghe, R. Lalitha, and S. Fernando, “Students’ Satisfaction in Higher Education Literature Review,” American Journal of Educational Research, 2017.
[2] J. Wiers-Jenssen, B. Stensaker, and J. B. Grøgaard, “Student Satisfaction: Towards an empirical deconstruction of the concept,” Int. J. Phytoremediation, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 183–195, 2002.
[3] N. Motefakker, “ScienceDirect The Study of the Level of Satisfaction of the Students of the Faculty of Social Sciences with Welfare Services of the Imam Khomeini International University of Qazvin,” Procedia Econ. Finance., vol. 36, pp. 399–407, 2016.
[4] C. Wegner, L. Minnaert, and F. Strehlke, “The importance of learning strategies and how the project ‘Kolumbus-Kids’ promotes them successfully,” Eur. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 137–143, 2013.
[5] A. K. Gill and & Kusum, “TEACHING APPROACHES, METHODS AND STRATEGY,” Sch. Res. J. Interdiscip. Stud., vol. 4, no. 36, pp. 6692–6697, 2017.
[6] J. C. Issac, “Methods and strategies of teaching,” Pondicherry University Press, 2010.
[7] S. Islam and S. Pandey, “Overview of Teaching Strategies,” J. Adv. Sch. Res. ALLIED Educ., vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 289–295, May 2019
[8] E. J. Ferreira et al., Business administration. Cape Town South Africa: Juta and Company, 2017.
[9] E. J. Cancio, S. F. Albrecht, and B. H. Johns, “Defining administrative support and its relationship to the attrition of teachers of students with emotional and behavioral disorders,” Educ. Treat. Child., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 71–94, 2013.
[10]V. Sum, S. J. Mccaskey, and C. Kyeyune, “A survey research of satisfaction levels of graduate students enrolled in a nationally ranked top-10 program at a mid-western university,” Res. High. Educ. J., pp. 1–17, 2010.
[11]V. Tinto, “Leaving College?: Rethinking the Causes and Cures,” p. 1993, 1993.
[12]C. Danielson, “Is Satisfying College Students the same as Decreasing Their Dissatisfaction?,” AIR Forum Publ. Committee, ED422812, pp. 1–17, May 1998.
[13]L. Roberson, C. T. Kulik, and M. B. Pepper, “Designing effective diversity training: Influence of group composition and trainee experience,” J. Organ. Behav., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 871–885, Dec. 2001.