Factors Preventing Mr. Pitha Limcharoenrat from Becoming the Prime Minister of Thailand despite Winning the Election

Bundit Anuyahong¹

1. Southport, Gold Coast, Australia.

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal-Paper
Vol.9 , Issue.11 , pp.34-42, Nov-2023

Online published on Nov 30, 2023

Copyright © Bundit Anuyahong . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

151 Views    158 Downloads    57 Downloads

Abstract :
This research aims to investigate the factors that have contributed to Mr. Pitha Limcharoenrat`s inability to assume the role of Prime Minister of Thailand, despite his victory in the election. The study will focus on five key factors: the influence of democratic institutions, the dynamics of parliamentary support, judicial interventions, the role of conservative political parties, and the involvement of influential business groups with vested interests. By exploring the interplay of these factors, the research seeks to understand the complexities that hindered Mr. Pitha Limcharoenrat`s path to the Prime Ministerial position. The significance of democratic institutions in ensuring the legitimacy of elected governments will be examined, alongside the impact of opposition strategies and coalition formation on his ability to form a stable government. The study will also explore the role of the Constitutional Court in shaping his candidacy and investigate the influence of conservative political parties and influential business groups in obstructing his leadership prospects. The findings are expected to have implications for democratic governance in Thailand and offer valuable insights for other democracies facing similar challenges. A combination of qualitative and statistical analyses will be employed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the complex political landscape surrounding Mr. Pitha Limcharoenrat`s candidacy.

Key-Words / Index Term :
democratic institutions, leadership transitions, parliamentary support, judicial interventions, opposition strategies, business groups, democratic governance, Thailand

References :
[1]. R. A. Dahl, "Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition," Yale University Press, 1971.
[2]. P. Norris, "Why Electoral Integrity Matters," Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[3]. S. Rasri, "Political Landscape of Thailand: A Comparative Analysis of Recent Elections," Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Vol.39, No.2, pp.215-232, 2022.
[4]. S. Sudsomboon, A. Panon, D. Treetrap, and P. Rattanamusik, "Political Participation in Democracy Thai of New Generation," in Proceedings of the 10th STOU National Research Conference, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, pp.23-33, 2020.
[5]. P. Samrerum, "Study the Direct-election Way of Thailand’s Prime Minister," Academic Journal, Phranakhon Rajabhat University, Vol.6, No.1, pp.37-45, 2015.
[6]. P. Ratnadilok, "Politics: Analysis of NIDA Poll `Election 2566` and Various Factors of Victory," NIDA Impacts Journal, May– August, Vol.2, pp.39-49, 2023.
[7]. D. H. Levin, "When the Great Power Gets a Vote: The Effects of Great Power Electoral Interventions on Election Results," International Studies Quarterly, Vol.60, No.2, pp.189-202, 2016.
[8]. E. O`Malley, "Investigating the Effects of Directly Electing the Prime Minister," Government and Opposition, Vol.41, No.2, pp.137-162, 2006.
[9]. S. Kasetsiri, "The Rise and Fall of Democracy in Thailand," Pacific Affairs, Vol.73, No.1, pp.29-47, 2000.
[10]. J. J. Linz and A. Stepan, "Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe," Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
[11]. J. A. Cheibub, A. Przeworski, and S. M. Saiegh, "Government coalitions and legislative success under presidentialism and parliamentarism," British Journal of Political Science, Vol.40, No.1, pp.77-100, 2010. doi:10.1017/S0007123409990306.
[12]. G. Sartori, "Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis," Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
[13]. K. Strøm, "Minority government and majority rule," Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[14]. M. Gallagher, "Election administration in divided societies: A comparative study," Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
[15]. C. N. Tate and T. Vallinder (Eds.), "The global expansion of judicial power," New York: New York University Press, 1995.
[16]. M. W. Svolik, "The politics of authoritarian rule," Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
[17]. B. Magaloni and R. Kricheli, "Political order and one-party rule," Annual Review of Political Science, Vol.13, pp.123-143, 2010. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.040907.145850.
[18]. W. K. Carroll, "The making of a transnational capitalist class: Corporate power in the 21st century," London: Zed Books, 2017.
[19]. A. L. Schneider and J. L. Tobin (Eds.), "Comparative politicization: The Nordic countries in a comparative perspective," London: Routledge, 2015.
[20]. B. Reilly, "Electoral Systems for Divided Societies," Journal of Democracy, Vol.13, No.2, pp.156-170, 2002.
[21]. D. J. Lanoue and B. Headrick, "Prime Ministers, Parties, and the Public: The Dynamics of Government Popularity in Great Britain," The Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol.58, No.2, pp.191-209, 1994.