Full Paper View Go Back
Osuagwu 1 , Chidimma Udo2 , Mbachu Hope Ifeyinwa3
- Dept. of Statistics/School of Physical Sciences, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria.
- Dept., Statistics/Faculty of Sciences, Imo State University, Owerri, Nigeria.
Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal-Paper
Vol.10 ,
Issue.11 , pp.75-81, Nov-2024
Online published on Nov 30, 2024
Copyright © Osuagwu, Chidimma Udo, Mbachu Hope Ifeyinwa . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
View this paper at Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library
How to Cite this Paper
- IEEE Citation
- MLA Citation
- APA Citation
- BibTex Citation
- RIS Citation
IEEE Style Citation: Osuagwu, Chidimma Udo, Mbachu Hope Ifeyinwa, “Comparative Evaluation of Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, and Latin Square Design: A Simulation Study,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Multidisciplinary Studies , Vol.10, Issue.11, pp.75-81, 2024.
MLA Style Citation: Osuagwu, Chidimma Udo, Mbachu Hope Ifeyinwa "Comparative Evaluation of Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, and Latin Square Design: A Simulation Study." International Journal of Scientific Research in Multidisciplinary Studies 10.11 (2024): 75-81.
APA Style Citation: Osuagwu, Chidimma Udo, Mbachu Hope Ifeyinwa, (2024). Comparative Evaluation of Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, and Latin Square Design: A Simulation Study. International Journal of Scientific Research in Multidisciplinary Studies , 10(11), 75-81.
BibTex Style Citation:
@article{Udo_2024,
author = {Osuagwu, Chidimma Udo, Mbachu Hope Ifeyinwa},
title = {Comparative Evaluation of Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, and Latin Square Design: A Simulation Study},
journal = {International Journal of Scientific Research in Multidisciplinary Studies },
issue_date = {11 2024},
volume = {10},
Issue = {11},
month = {11},
year = {2024},
issn = {2347-2693},
pages = {75-81},
url = {https://www.isroset.org/journal/IJSRMS/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=3705},
publisher = {IJCSE, Indore, INDIA},
}
RIS Style Citation:
TY - JOUR
UR - https://www.isroset.org/journal/IJSRMS/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=3705
TI - Comparative Evaluation of Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, and Latin Square Design: A Simulation Study
T2 - International Journal of Scientific Research in Multidisciplinary Studies
AU - Osuagwu, Chidimma Udo, Mbachu Hope Ifeyinwa
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/11/30
PB - IJCSE, Indore, INDIA
SP - 75-81
IS - 11
VL - 10
SN - 2347-2693
ER -
Abstract :
The study examined the comparative evaluation of completely randomized design, randomized complete block design, and Latin square design: a simulation study. Experimental design plays a crucial role in ensuring the validity and reliability of research findings. This simulation study compared the efficiency, power, and precision of Completely Randomized Design (CRD), Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), and Latin Square Design (LSD) in an experiment. A total of 63 combinations of sample sizes, treatment levels, and block sizes were evaluated. Results showed that RCBD and LSD outperformed CRD in terms of efficiency, power, and precision, particularly at larger sample sizes and treatment levels. Increasing sample size, treatment levels, and block size enhanced efficiency, power, and precision for all designs. The study recommends the use of RCBD or LSD designs for agricultural experiments, especially when treatment levels and block sizes are large. The findings have practical implications for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners in agriculture and related fields.
Key-Words / Index Term :
Experimental Design, Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, Latin Square Design, Efficiency, Power, Precision, Simulation Study
References :
[1] F. N. Kerlinger, H. B. Lee, “Foundations of Behavioral Research”, Cengage Learning, USA, pp. 784-791, 2020.
[2] J. W. Creswell, D. J. Creswell, “Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches”, Sage Publications, USA, pp. 416-421, 2022.
[3] D. C. Montgomery, “Design and Analysis of Experiments”, Wiley, USA, pp. 784-789, 2020.
[4] J. P. A. Ioannidis, “Experimental Design and Data Analysis in Medical Research”, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol.127, pp. 10-18, 2020.
[5] W. M. Trochim, J. P., Donnelly, A. Arora, “Research Methods: the Essential Knowledge Base”. Cengage Learning, USA, pp. 560-567, 2021.
[6] R. K. Roy, “A Primer on Experimental Design with Applications in Engineering”, CRC Press, USA, pp. 448-455, 2022.
[7] K. A., Gomez, A. A. Gomez, “Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research”, Wiley, USA, pp. 624-632, 2023.
[8] G. E. P. Box, J. S. Hunter, W. G. Hunter, “Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation, and Discovery”, Wiley, USA, pp. 664-675, 2020.
[9] W. R. Shadish, T. D., Cook, D. T. Campbell, “Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference”, Houghton Mifflin, USA, pp. 744-756, 2020.
[10] D. R. Cox, N. Reid, “The Theory of the Design of Experiments”, Chapman and Hall, Canada, pp. 608-621, 2020.
[11] J. Peng, J. Zhang, Y. Wang, “Sample Size Determination for Experiments with Multiple Factors”, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 208, pp. 1-15, 2021.
[12] C. F. J. Wu, M. Hamada, “Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Optimization”, Wiley, USA, pp. 720-731, 2022.
[13] A. S. Hedayat, N. J. A. Sloane, J. Stufken, “Orthogonal Arrays: Theory and Applications”, Springer, USA, pp. 752-764, 2023.
[14] R. V. Lenth, “Some Practical Guidelines for Effective Experimental Design”, American Statistician, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 141-148, 2021.
[15] G. M. Kemper, K. R. Johnson, J. D. Smith, “Comparative Analysis of Experimental Designs” Journal of Experimental Research, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 12-25, 2020.
[16] M. Khoshgoftar, R. Gholami, M. Yousefi, “Comparison of Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, and Latin Square Design in Agricultural Experiments”, Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 1-12, 2022.
[17] M. M. Rahman, M. A. Hossain, M. A. Islam, “Efficiency of Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, and Latin Square Design in Clinical Trials”, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 257-271, 2020.
[18] R. Singh, V. Kumar, P. Sharma, “Comparative Evaluation of Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, and Latin Square Design for Yield Trials”, Crop Science, Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 539-551, 2021.
[19] E. O. Oladipo, D. O. Ogunjimi, A. O. Adepoju, “Simulation Study on Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, and Latin Square Design for Agricultural Research”, Agricultural Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 1-13, 2020.
[20] M. A. Khan, M. Hussain, M. Ahmad, “Comparative Analysis of Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, and Latin Square Design in Pharmaceutical Experiments”, Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 1-12, 2022.
[21] S. Ghosh, S. Bhattacharya, S. Chakraborty. “Evaluation of Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, and Latin Square Design for Animal Science Experiments”, Animal Science Research, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 1-15, 2021.
[22] A. M. Al-Smadi, A. M. Al-Haj, J. A. Al-Shraideh, “Comparative Study of Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, and Latin Square Design in Engineering Experiments”, Journal of Engineering Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 1-14, 2020.
[23] S. Bhattacharya, S. Ghosh, S. Chakraborty, “Efficiency of Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, and Latin Square Design in Medical Research”, Journal of Medical Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 1-12, 2022.
[24] Y. Chen, X. Wang, Y. Li, “Simulation Study on Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, and Latin Square Design for Business Research”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 124, No. 3, pp. 11-29, 2021.
[25] A. O. Adebayo, D. O. Ogunjimi, A. O. Adepoju, “Comparative Evaluation of Completely Randomized Design, Randomized Complete Block Design, and Latin Square Design in Environmental Science Experiments”, Environmental Science Research, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1-16, 2020
You do not have rights to view the full text article.
Please contact administration for subscription to Journal or individual article.
Mail us at support@isroset.org or view contact page for more details.