Linear and Non-Linear Turbulence Models of shock/boundary-layer interaction at Hypersonic Flows

Sravan Kumar Kota¹ , Mohamaed Shahid²

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal-Paper
Vol.7 , Issue.5 , pp.16-25, Oct-2019

Online published on Oct 31, 2019

Copyright © Sravan Kumar Kota, Mohamaed Shahid . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

Abstract :
Association of shock waves with a turbulent boundary layer assumes a significant job in the structure and operability of fast aviation vehicles and air-breathing motors. The antagonistic pressure slope of the shock is frequently sufficiently able to isolate the boundary layer. The target of present research paper bargains hypersonic viscous streams overwhelmed by solid shock wave boundary layer associations over wing-fold and wing-fuselage intersection setups have been broke down. The impacts of the control surface diversion point, driving edge shape and viscous association parameter on the stream field have been assessed. Moreover, the variations of angle of attack with linear and nonlinear turbulent eddy viscous models have been studied. Scaling laws for the upstream impact, pinnacle warming, Pressure co-effective, Skin contact and streamlined coefficients have been set up by methods for numerical re-enactments and hypothetical contemplations. Both Linear and Non-Linear disturbance models are considered during reproduction of SWBLI. Tecplot assumes a pivotal job for deciphering and post processing CFD information to numerical data for differentiating by and large. Also, great emphasis has given to enlarge the interaction zone in order to visualize the precise conditions hindered around the separation bubble and wall. CFL number variations have affected to ascend the contour levels substantially to attain the exact vectors for boundary conditions

Key-Words / Index Term :
High speed flows, Shock wave, Boundary layer, Separation bubble, Turbulence modeling, Shock Interaction

References :
[1].Babinsky H, Harvey JK. “Shock-Wave Boundary Layer Interaction”, Cambridge University, 1st edition.Page 151-159,166-169,268, 2011.
[2].Sravan Kumar Kota, P.V Subbaraju “Computational Analysis of Shockwave–Boundary Layer Interaction at Hypersonic Speeds”,International Journal of Computer Aided Manufacturing, Vol. 5: Issue 2 Page 4-8,2019.
[3]. V. Mikulla and C.C. “Horstmanj, “Turbulence Measurements in Hypersonic Shock-Wave Boundary-Layer Interaction Flows” American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Vol 14,No-5,Page 2-4.
[4].Sang Dug Kim,Chang oh Kwan, et al., “Comparision of turbulence models in shockwave/Turbulent boundary layer interaction”KSME International Journal, Vol-18,No-1,PP-153-156,2004.
[5].Amjaed Ali Pasha, “Numerical prediction of shock/boundary-layer interactions at high Mach numbers using a modified Spalart–Allmaras model” Engineering applications of computational fluid mechanics vol. 12, no. 1, page 459–472,2018.
[6]. F.Grassoand M. Marini, “Analysis of hypersonic shock-wave laminar boundary-layer interaction phenomena” Computers and fluids, Vol-25,No-6,PP-561-581,1996.
[7] Stephen B .Pope, “Turbulent Flows”, Cornell University,Cambridege Series,1st Edition,Pages:359-406,2000.
[8] H .Tennekes, J.L Lumley, “A first course in Turbulence” The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press,1st edition, pages:7-11,52-57,1972