Full Paper View Go Back
A Wrong Argument in a Seminal Physics Paper
A. Leon1
Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal-Paper
Vol.8 ,
Issue.1 , pp.24-26, Feb-2020
CrossRef-DOI: https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrpas/v8i1.2426
Online published on Feb 28, 2020
Copyright © A. Leon . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
View this paper at Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library
How to Cite this Paper
- IEEE Citation
- MLA Citation
- APA Citation
- BibTex Citation
- RIS Citation
IEEE Style Citation: A. Leon, “A Wrong Argument in a Seminal Physics Paper,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Physics and Applied Sciences, Vol.8, Issue.1, pp.24-26, 2020.
MLA Style Citation: A. Leon "A Wrong Argument in a Seminal Physics Paper." International Journal of Scientific Research in Physics and Applied Sciences 8.1 (2020): 24-26.
APA Style Citation: A. Leon, (2020). A Wrong Argument in a Seminal Physics Paper. International Journal of Scientific Research in Physics and Applied Sciences, 8(1), 24-26.
BibTex Style Citation:
@article{Leon_2020,
author = {A. Leon},
title = {A Wrong Argument in a Seminal Physics Paper},
journal = {International Journal of Scientific Research in Physics and Applied Sciences},
issue_date = {2 2020},
volume = {8},
Issue = {1},
month = {2},
year = {2020},
issn = {2347-2693},
pages = {24-26},
url = {https://www.isroset.org/journal/IJSRPAS/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=1707},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v8i1.2426}
publisher = {IJCSE, Indore, INDIA},
}
RIS Style Citation:
TY - JOUR
DO = {https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v8i1.2426}
UR - https://www.isroset.org/journal/IJSRPAS/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=1707
TI - A Wrong Argument in a Seminal Physics Paper
T2 - International Journal of Scientific Research in Physics and Applied Sciences
AU - A. Leon
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/02/28
PB - IJCSE, Indore, INDIA
SP - 24-26
IS - 1
VL - 8
SN - 2347-2693
ER -
595 Views
270 Downloads
94 Downloads
Abstract :
This article examines a wrong argument in a seminal physics paper published 114 years ago: Einstein`s paper on the electrodynamics of moving objects. Although the argument in question is not determinant for the main conclusions of the paper (thanks to the prevalence of Lorentz transformation also deduced in the same paper), it contains several basic and significant errors that have remained undetected to this day. Those errors are consequences of a misinterpretation of the Principle of Relativity, surprisingly the same misinterpretation one can find in some naĂŻve critiques of special relativity. Considering the relevance of the article and its author and the importance of the errors, there is no alternative but to make them public.
Key-Words / Index Term :
Principle of relativity, special relativity, relativity of simultaneity, Einstein test for synchronous clocks
References :
[1] A. Einstein, “Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper”, Annalen der Physik, vol. 17, pp. 891-921, 1905.
[2] M. Born, “Physics in my generation. A selection of papers”, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1969.
[3] A. R. Elvira, “Cien años de relatividad. Los artĂculos clave de 1905 y 1906,” Nivola, Madrid, 2003.
[4] H. A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski, H. Weyl and A. Sommerfeld, “The Principle of Relativity”, Methuen and Company, London, 1923.
[5] A. Einstein, “De l`eléctrodynamique des corpss en mouvement”, Les classiques des sciences sociales, Université de Québec, 2012.
You do not have rights to view the full text article.
Please contact administration for subscription to Journal or individual article.
Mail us at support@isroset.org or view contact page for more details.
