Gravity or Complexity?

S.Natarajan ¹ , R.Chandramohan ²

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Isroset-Journal
Vol.6 , Issue.5 , pp.75-79, Oct-2018

CrossRef-DOI:   https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrpas/v6i5.7579

Online published on Oct 31, 2018

Copyright © S.Natarajan, R.Chandramohan . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

362 Views    214 Downloads    159 Downloads

Abstract :
Construction of Einstein field equations for the freely falling shell is explained. Modifications of gravitational theory from Newtonian view to quantum complexity is analyzed and discussed. Gravity has been revisited and treated as component of quantum complexity. Proposed cause of bodies falling into the black hole may be due to the changes occurring in the quantum complexity. Trajectory of infalling object is derived with trajectory of quantum complexity. A possible connection for quantum mechanics and general relativity is discussed. Some specialized theories such as holographic principle is also discussed for gravity which treat gravity as illusion. Relationship between gravitational attraction and changes in quantum complexity is elaborated.

Key-Words / Index Term :
Gravity, Illusion of gravity, Holographic principle, Quantum complexity, Complexity and gravity, Quantization of gravity

References :
[1] Judson, L.. Aristotle`s Physics: A Collection of Essays, 1991.
[2] Brown, A. R., Susskind, L., & Zhao, Y. . Quantum complexity and negative curvature. Physical Review D, 95(4), 045010, 2017.
[3] Stukeley, W. . Memoirs of Sir Isaac Newton`s Life. Taylor and Francis, 1936.
[4] Cavendish, H., et al.: Xxi. experiments to determine the density of the earth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 88, 469–526, 1798.
[5] Galilei, G.: On Motion, and On Mechanics: Comprising De Motu (ca. 1590), vol. 5.University of Wisconsin Press, 1960.
[6] Cartlidge, E.: Galileo’s 400-year-old theory of free-falling objects passes space test, Science. 2017
[7] Einstein, A.: The foundation of the general theory of relativity. Annalen Phys. 49(7),769–822. 1916
[8] Hubble, E., Humason, M.L.: The velocity-distance relation among extra-galactic nebulae. The Astrophysical Journal 74, 43. 1931
[9] Nussbaumer, H.: Einstein’s conversion from his static to an expanding universe. The European Physical Journal H 39(1), 37–62, 2014.
[10] Kiefer, C.: Why quantum gravity? In: Approaches to Fundamental Physics, pp. 123–130. Springer , 2007
[11] Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical review 47(10), 777, 1935.
[12] Einstein, A., Rosen, N.: The particle problem in the general theory of relativity. Physical Review 48(1), 73 ,1935.
[13] Susskind, L. Copenhagen vs everett, teleportation, and er= epr. Fortschritte der Physik, 64(6-7), 551-564, 2016.
[14] Hooft, G.: Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity. arXiv preprint gr-qc/9310026, 1993.
[15] Bousso, R.: The holographic principle. Reviews of Modern Physics 74(3), 825, 2002.
[16] Bernstein, E., Vazirani, U.: Quantum complexity theory. SIAM Journal on Computing 26(5), 1411–1473. 1997.
[17] Susskind, L. Computational complexity and black hole horizons. Fortschritte der Physik, 64(1), 24-43,2016.
[18] Susskind, L. Why do Things Fall?. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.01198, 2018.
[19] Maldacena, J. The illusion of gravity. Scientific American, 293(5), 56-63, 2005.
[20] R. K. Das, “Modified Gravity Model with Dark Energy for Accelerating Universe”, International Journal of Scientific Research in Physics and Applied Sciences, Vol.6, Issue.1, pp.5-9, 2018