Gender Analysis of Access to Human Capital in Nigeria: A Case Study of School Enrolment

Salami R.O.¹ , Isaac I.² , Habila J.³ , Salami H.⁴ , Abutu P.⁵

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal-Paper
Vol.7 , Issue.2 , pp.25-31, Dec-2019

Online published on Dec 31, 2019

Copyright © Salami R.O., Isaac I., Habila J., Salami H., Abutu P. . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

Abstract :
Women and girls account for about 50% of the world’s population. However, they have been subjected to arbitrary deprivation in many parts of the world. In developing countries, the most noticeable deprivation that women suffer is related to the access to, and control of assets. This has become entrenched owing to the high rate of illiteracy amongst women, while the males continue to get educated and brighten their life chances. This study aimed at assessing access to human capital among girls/women in Nigeria. This study is based on secondary data on school enrolment which were obtained from several published and unpublished sources. These data were descriptively analysed in simple percentages, and it was discovered that there has been persistent inequality in school enrolment in Nigeria since the country’s independence in 1960. This indicates preference for male children in Nigeria, despite being a signatory to several international covenants, agreements and laws that emphasise equal treatment for people irrespective of their gender. Enrolment has been consistently in favour of the male-child from primary school to university level. Since literacy is one major pillar of Human Development Index (HDI), it is clear from this that the human development of women in Nigeria is low (from the perspective of access to education). This study, therefore recommends that priority should be given to female children in admission in order to close the already existing gender-gap; girls should be admitted into specialised programmes and strict penalties should be meted on parents that deliberately refuse to enrol their daughters in school.

Key-Words / Index Term :
Gender, Deprivation, Human capital, Enrolment, Exclusion

References :
[1] United Nations. Women and decision-making: Women 2000. New York.1993
[2] Moser, C. O.N. Gender planning and development: Theory, practice and training. London: Taylor & Francis e-Library. 2003
[3] Osler, A., Street, C., Lall, M. and Vincent, K. Not a Problem? Girls
and school exclusion, London: National Children’s Bureau. 2001
[4] Osler, A., Street, C., Lall, M. and Vincent, K. Not a Problem? Girls
and school exclusion, London: National Children’s Bureau. 2002
[5] Stiglitz, Joseph E. "Equal opportunity, our national myth." The New York Times 16, 2013.
[6] Osler, A., & Vincent, K. Girls and exclusion: rethinking the agenda. Routledge. 2003
[7] Murdoch, Lydia. Imagined orphans: Poor families, child welfare, and contested citizenship in London. Rutgers University Press, 2006.
[8] Hart, Craig H., Diane C. Burts, and Rosalind Charlesworth, eds. Integrated curriculum and developmentally appropriate practice: Birth to age eight. Suny Press, 1997.
[9] Jain, A. and Belsky, J. Fathering and acculturation: Immigrant Indian families with young children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, pp.873-883. 1997.
[10] United Nations (1997). Women and decision-making: Women 2000. New York.
[11] Sen, A. Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 1985
[12] Sen, A. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1999
[13] Francis, B. and Hey, V. Talking back to power. Gender and Education, Vol. 21, issue 2, 225–232, 2009.
[14] Bohnet, I. Leadership. In WEF. Five challenges, one solution: Women. World Economic Forum. pp. 10-13, 2013
[15] Piachaurd, D. (2000). Child poverty, opportunities and quality of life. The Political Quarterly, 72(4), 446–453.
[16] Slee, R. The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. London: Routledge. 2010
[17] Sen, A., & Nussbaum, M. The quality of life. Oxford: ClarendonPress. 1993
[18] Parsons, C. Permanent exclusions from schools in England: Trends, causes and responses. Children and Society, vol. 10, 177–186, 1995
[19] Parsons, C. School exclusion: The will to punish. British Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 53, issue 2, 187–211, 2005.
[20] Parsons, C. Strategic alternatives to exclusion from school. London: Trentham Books. 2011.
[22] Gilborn, D. Exclusion from School: An Overview of the Issues. In Donovan, N. (Ed). Second chances: Exclusion from school and equality of opportunity. London: New Policy Institute. 1998.
[23] Munn, P., & Lloyd, G. Exclusion and excluded pupils. British Educational Research Journal, vol. 31, issue 2, 205–221, 2005.
[24] Munn, P., Cullen, M., Johnstone, M. and Lloyd, G. Exclusion from school. Research Papers in Education, vol. 16, issue 1, 23–42, 2001.
[26] Booth, D., Holland, J., Hentschel, J., Lanjouw, P., & Herbert, A. Participation and combined methods in African Poverty Assessment: Renewing the agenda. Department for International Development, Social Development Division, African Division, London. 1998
[27] Chambers, R. Vulnerability, coping and policy. IDS Bulletin, Vol. 20, Issue 2, 1–7, 1989.
[28] Rakodi, C. A livelihoods approach: Conceptual issues and definitions. In Rakodi, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. (Eds.).Urban livelihoods: A people-centred approach to reducing poverty. London: Earthscan. pp. 3-22, 2002.
[29] Rakodi, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T.Urban livelihoods: A people-centred approach to reducing poverty (1st Ed.). London: Earthscan. 2002.
[30] Saito, W. H. Demography. In WEF (2013). Five challenges, one solution: Women. World Economic Forum. pp. 4-9. 2013.
[31] Agenda, U. N. "21. 1992." Local agenda 21, the UN programme of action 1992.
[32] DFID, DFID. "department for international Development." Trading for Peace–An agenda of Reform 2009.
[33] Morse,S.,&McNamara, N. (2013). Sustainable livelihood approach. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
[34] Dollar, D., Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (1999). Are women really the fairer sex? Corruption and women in government – policy research report on gender and development. Working Paper Series No. 4. Washington, D.C: World Bank.
[35] Vincent, John A. Inequality and old age. Routledge, 2003.
[36] Wilkinson, Richard, and Kate Pickett. The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. Penguin UK, 2010.
[37] National Bureau of Statistics (2019). Statistical report for men and women: 2018. Abuja: National Bureau of Statistics.
[38] UNESCO (2010). Reaching the marginalised: Education for All monitoring report, 2010. Oxford University Press