The Paradox between Interventionism and Liberalism in the Sharing of Public Goods

Brahim Idelhakkar¹ , Said Tritah² , Amin Hadri³

1. Department of Economic., Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Larache Polydisciplinary Faculty, Morocco.
2. Department of Economic., Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Larache Polydisciplinary Faculty, Morocco.
3. Department of Economics, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, ENCGT, Morocco.

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal-Paper
Vol.8 , Issue.1 , pp.18-23, Mar-2020

Online published on Mar 30, 2020

Copyright © Brahim Idelhakkar, Said Tritah, Amin Hadri . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

222 Views    169 Downloads    76 Downloads

Abstract :
The central problem of the economy results from two observations: the productive resources are scarce and the needs are unlimited [1].The economy is the alternative use of scarce resources to maximize the welfare of the whole community. So the budgetary controls is generally recognized as the main instrument for allocating resources to specific recurrent and development activities [2].The allocation of resources is important for two reasons: (1) Any government activity has an influence on the allocation of resources and any production of a good or service involves a sacrifice: labor or equipment required: for example, public transport service provision imposes an opportunity cost which is measured by the quantity of other goods or services that could have been produced with the resources taken by the public authorities and which are no longer available for the private sector, that is why the State must be careful not to waste these productive resources by allocating them inefficiently. (2) The government don`t have an obligation to negotiate or respect the norms of optimal allocation of resources in the production of its own services. It is therefore a question here of evaluating the different allocations of goods and services so as to be able to determine if some are better than others, and in particular, if it is possible, what is the best, which is the best of all: This is the subject of our discussion on this paper

Key-Words / Index Term :
welfare, sovereignty, utility, allocation, - free-rider, optimum, information, cardinal, ordinal

References :
[1] Lionel Charles Robbins, Baron Robbins, "Economics and Political Economy", 1981, AER.
[2] Aliyu Abba An Evaluation of the Application of Budgetary Control in the Nigerian Sub-National Public Sector Vol.7, Issue.2, pp.39-50, World Academics Journal of Management December(2019)
[3] Soderlind, Steven Dale Consumer Economics:: A Practical Overview. Routledge. ISBN 9781315291598. (September 16, 2017).
[4] Deardorff, Alan V. "Welfare economics", Deardorffs` Glossary of International Economics. (2014)
[5] Sirgy, M. Joseph; Lee, Dong-Jin; Yu, Grace B. "Consumer Sovereignty in Healthcare: Fact or Fiction?". Journal of Business Ethics. (1 July 2011).
[6] Michael Quinn, « Jeremy Bentham, ‘The Psychology of Economic Man’, and Behavioural Economics », Œconomia, 6-1 | 2016, 3-32
[7] Mas-Colell, Andreu; Whinston, Michael; & Green, Jerry Microeconomic .Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-507340-1. (1995).
[8] YEW-KWANG NG The Review of Economic Studies, Bentham or Bergson? Finite Sensibility, Utility Functions and Social Welfare Functions. 2015
[9] Roberto Serrano,. "bargaining," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. 2008
[10] AKERLOF, George Arthur, The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism; The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 488-500, 1970
[11] -Thompson, Donald. "The Proper Role of Government: Considering Public Goods and Private Goods". The Pennsylvania State University, 2015
[12] Berger, Sebastian.The Social Costs of Neoliberalism: Essays on the Economics of K. William Kapp. Nottingham: Spokesman. 2017
[13] Ludwig von Mises Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, vol. 36, 1926.