Designing Optimal Repetitive Sampling Plan Using Truncated Poisson distribution

Subramani Kandasamy¹ , Ambika Subramanian² , Haridoss Venugopal³

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Isroset-Journal
Vol.6 , Issue.2 , pp.233-238, Apr-2019

CrossRef-DOI:   https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrmss/v6i2.233238

Online published on Apr 30, 2019

Copyright © Subramani Kandasamy, Ambika Subramanian, Haridoss Venugopal . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

332 Views    189 Downloads    97 Downloads

Abstract :
Acceptance sampling plan for attributes develop to control the quality, where both the consumers and the producers get benefit for better quality of the product. Repetitive group sampling plan is one of the most adoptable and cost effective sampling plan to get the product accepted with high quality level desired for production process. In this scenario overall risk to make wrong decision is reduced by considering the concept of truncation. Tables and a procedure for the acceptance and limiting level are developed to minimize the producers and consumers risks using the Truncated Poisson distribution. Optimality criteria are compared using Operating Characteristics curve with the already existing work.

Key-Words / Index Term :
Attribute plan, OC curve, Producer’s Risk, consumer risk, Repetitive Group Sampling (RGS), Truncated Poisson Distribution

References :
[1] Sherman, R.E, “Design and Evaluation of a Repetitive Group Sampling Plan”, Technometrics, Vol.10, Issue.1, pp.11-21, 1965.
[2].Hamaker.H.C, “Attribute Sampling Operation”, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, Vol.37, Issue. 2, pp.265 – 281, 1960.
[3].Wetherill, G.B. and Chiu, W.K, “A Review of Acceptance Sampling Schemes with Emphasis on the Economic Aspect”, Int. Stat. Rev., Vol.43, Issue.2, 191-210, 1975.
[4]. Rao.C.R, “On Discrete Distributions Arising out of Methods of Ascertainment”, Sankhya ser, A,Vol.27, pp.311- 324,1965.
[5]. Dodge.H.F, “ Evaluation of Sampling Inspection System having Rules for Switching between Normal and Tighted Inspection”, Technical Report No.14(The Statistics Centre, Rutgers, The State university of New Brunswick, NJ), 1965.
[6].Soundararajan.V, “Sampling Inspection Plans when the Sample Size is Fixed”, Journal of Madras University, Section B, Vol.44, pp.9-19,1992.
[7].Wortham,A.W and Mogg,J.M , “Dependent Stage Sampling Inspection”, The International Journal of Production Research, Vol.8, Issue.4, pp.385-395,1970.
[8].Schilling, E.G, “Acceptance Sampling Plan in Quality Control”. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1982.
[9] Ducan.A.J, “Quality Control and Industrial Statistics”, Richard D.Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL, 1986.
[10] D. C. Montgomery, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
[11].Soundararajan.V and Ramasamy.M.M, “Designing Repetitive Group Sampling (RGS) Plan Indexed by AQL and LQL, IAPQR Transactions”, Vol.9, Issue 1, pp.9-14,1984.
[12]. Soundararajan.V and Ramasamy.M.M, “Procedures and Tables for Construction of Repetitive Group Sampling (RGS) Plan”, The QR journal, Vol.13, Issue.3, pp.14-21,1986.
[13].Govindaraju.K, “An Interesting Observation in Acceptance Sampling”, Economic Quality Control, Vol.2, Issue.4, pp.89-92, 1987.
[14].Subramani. K and Govindaraju.K, “Selection of Modified Quick Switching System for given Acceptable and Limiting Quality Level”, Journal od Applied Statistics Review, Vol.43,Issue 2, pp.191-210,1993.
[15].K. Subramani & V.Haridoss, “Selection of Single Sampling Attribute Plan for Given Acceptance Quality Level and Limiting Quality Level Involving Minimum Risks using Weighted Poisson Distribution”, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol 7, Issue 3,pp. 3-14,2012.
[16].Cameron A.C, Johansson P, “Count Data Regression Using Series Expansions with Applications”. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol.12, Issue.3, 203–23,[1997].
[17]. Patil.G.P and Rao.C.R, “Weighted distributions and Size-Biased Sampling with Applications to Wildlife Population and Human Families”, Biometrics, Vol.34, Issue 2,179-189,1978.
[18].Patil.G.P, Rao.C.R and Ratnaparki.M.V, “On Discrete Weighted Distributions and Their Use in the Model for Observed Data”, Communication in Statistics-Theory and Models, Vol.15, Issue.3, pp.907-918,1986.
[19]. Joan Del Castillo and Peres-Casany , “Weighted Poisson Distributions for Underdispersion and Overdispersion Situation”, Ann.Inst.Statist.Math. Vol 50, Issue 3, pp.567-585,1998.
[20].R.Radhakrishnan and L.Mohana Priya (2008) , “Comparison of CRGS Plans using Poisson and Weighted Poisson Distributions”, Prob Stat Forum, Vol.1,Issue.5,pp.50-61,2008.
[21].J.R.Singh, A.Sanvalia, “Single sampling plan for variable index by AQL and AOQL with Known Coefficient of Variation”, International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol.5, Issue.10,pp.20-25,2017.
[22].R.S.Walse, G.D. Karandkar, P.U.Bhalchandra, “A Review: Design and Development of Novel Techniques for Clustering and Classification of Data”, International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering,Vol.6, Issue.1,pp.19-22,
[23] Subramani.K and Haridoss.V, “Selection of Repetitive Group Sampling (RGS) Plan for given AQL and LQL with Minimum Sum of Risks using Weighted Poisson Distribution”, International conference proceedings on Mathematical Modeling and Applied Soft Computing held at Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Vol. II, pp. 187-194, 2012.