Selection of Mixed Sampling Scheme with Conditional Repetitive Group Sampling Plan As Attribute Plan Indexed Through (MAPD, MAAOQ) and (MAPD, AOQL)

R. Kiruthika¹ , N. Kuppuswamy² , S. Praveen³

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal-Paper
Vol.6 , Issue.6 , pp.49-54, Dec-2019

Online published on Dec 31, 2019

Copyright © R. Kiruthika, N. Kuppuswamy, S. Praveen . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

Abstract :
This paper presents the process by which the Mixed Sampling scheme constructed and selected use MAPD as a value standard and MAAOQ as a performance metric with CRGS as an attribute plan using weighted Poisson distribution as a distribution on the base of a repetitive group sample plan. Maximum allowable percent defective is the quality level that corresponds to the point of inflection of the OC curve. Average Outgoing Quality Limit is the maximum AOQ over all possible levels of incoming quality. The MAAOQ is defined as the average outgoing quality (AOQ) at MAPD. The principal advantage of mixed sampling schemes over the pure attribute sampling scheme is a decrease in sample size for a related quantity of protection. The indexed plans are constructed and compared (MAPD, MAAOQ) and (MAPD, AOQL) for the natural selection of the plans and tables are provided.

Key-Words / Index Term :
Maximum allowable percentage defective, maximum allowable average outgoing quality level, Average outgoing quality level, Operating Characteristic

References :
[1] P.L. Mayer, “A note on sum of Poisson probabilities and an application’, ‘Industrial Quality Control”, Vol.19, No.5, pp.12-15, 1967.
[2] V.Soundararajan, “Maximum allowable percent defective (MAPD) single sampling inspection by attribute plan”, Journal of Quality Technology, Vol.7, No.4, pp.173-182, 1975.
[3] E.G. Schilling, “A General Method for Determining the Operating Characteristics of Mixed Variables-Attributes sampling plans Single side specifications, S.D.known”, Ph.D., Dissertation- Rutgers- The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersy, 1967.
[4] S. Devaarul, “Certain Studies Relating to Mixed Sampling Plans and Reliability-based Sampling Plans”, Ph.D., Dissertation, Department of Statistics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, 2003.
[5] R.E. Sherman, “Design and evaluation of a repetitive group sampling plan”, Technometrics, Vol.7, No.1, pp.11-21,1965.
[6] K. Subramani, “Studies on Designing Attribute Acceptance Sampling Plans with Emphasis on Chain Sampling plans”, Ph.D Thesis, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, 1991.
[7] V. Soundararajan and M.M. Ramasamy, “Designing repetitive group sampling plan indexed by AQL and LQL”, IAPQR Transaction, Vol.9, No.1, pp.9-14, 1984.
[8] V. Soundararajan and M.M. Ramasamy, “Procedures and tables for construction and selection of repetitive group sampling plan”, The QR journal, Vol.13, No.13, pp.14-21, 1986.
[9] R. Sampath Kumar, R .Kiruthika “Comparison of mixed sampling plan indexed through MAPD and LQL with single sampling plan as attribute plan using weighted Poisson distribution”, Journal of statistics science, Vol.3, No.2, pp. 165-173, 2011.
[10] R. Radhakrishnan et al., “Selection of mixed sampling plan with TNT- (n1, n2; 0) plan as attribute plan indexed through MAPD and MAAOQ”, International Journal of Statistics and system, Vol.5, No.4, pp.477-484.
[11] R. Sampath Kumar, “Construction and Selection of Mixed Variables - Attributes Sampling Plans” - Ph.D., Dissertation, Department of Statistics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, 2007.
[12] C. Radhakrishna Rao, “A natural example of a weighted binomial distribution”, The American Statistician, Vol.31, No.1, 1977.
[13] S. Sudeswari “Designing of Sampling Plan using Weighted Poisson distribution”. M.Phil., Dissertation, Department of Statistics, PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore, 2002.
[14] L. Mohana Priya, “Construction and Selection of Acceptance Sampling Plans based on Weighted Poisson Distribution”, Ph.D., Dissertation, Department of Statistics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, 2008.
[15] R. Radhakrishnan and L. Mohana Priya, “Selection of single sampling plan using conditional weighted Poisson distribution”, International Journal of Statistics and Systems, Vol.3, No.1, pp. 91-98, 2008.
[16] R. Radhakrishnan and L. Mohana Priya, “Comparison of CRGS plans using Poisson and weighted Poisson distribution”, Probstat Forum, Vol.1, No.1, pp.50-61, 2008.
[17] R. Sampath Kumar, R .Kiruthika “Comparison of mixed sampling plan indexed through MAPD and LQL with single sampling plan as attribute plan using weighted Poisson distribution”, Journal of statistics science, Vol.3, No.2, pp. 165-173, 2011.