Full Paper View Go Back

Correction when using Estimates in Logistic Regression for Longitudinal Data: An example of sepsis and C-reactive protein

Rosa C. S. Oliveira1

  1. Matemática, Faculdade de Ciências, Porto, Portugal.

Correspondence should be addressed to: rosita21@gmail.com.


Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal-Paper
Vol.7 , Issue.2 , pp.55-64, Apr-2020


Online published on Apr 30, 2020


Copyright © Rosa C. S. Oliveira . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library


XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

  • IEEE Citation
  • MLA Citation
  • APA Citation
  • BibTex Citation
  • RIS Citation

IEEE Style Citation: Rosa C. S. Oliveira, “Correction when using Estimates in Logistic Regression for Longitudinal Data: An example of sepsis and C-reactive protein,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Vol.7, Issue.2, pp.55-64, 2020.

MLA Style Citation: Rosa C. S. Oliveira "Correction when using Estimates in Logistic Regression for Longitudinal Data: An example of sepsis and C-reactive protein." International Journal of Scientific Research in Mathematical and Statistical Sciences 7.2 (2020): 55-64.

APA Style Citation: Rosa C. S. Oliveira, (2020). Correction when using Estimates in Logistic Regression for Longitudinal Data: An example of sepsis and C-reactive protein. International Journal of Scientific Research in Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, 7(2), 55-64.

BibTex Style Citation:
@article{Oliveira_2020,
author = {Rosa C. S. Oliveira},
title = {Correction when using Estimates in Logistic Regression for Longitudinal Data: An example of sepsis and C-reactive protein},
journal = {International Journal of Scientific Research in Mathematical and Statistical Sciences},
issue_date = {4 2020},
volume = {7},
Issue = {2},
month = {4},
year = {2020},
issn = {2347-2693},
pages = {55-64},
url = {https://www.isroset.org/journal/IJSRMSS/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=1832},
publisher = {IJCSE, Indore, INDIA},
}

RIS Style Citation:
TY - JOUR
UR - https://www.isroset.org/journal/IJSRMSS/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=1832
TI - Correction when using Estimates in Logistic Regression for Longitudinal Data: An example of sepsis and C-reactive protein
T2 - International Journal of Scientific Research in Mathematical and Statistical Sciences
AU - Rosa C. S. Oliveira
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/04/30
PB - IJCSE, Indore, INDIA
SP - 55-64
IS - 2
VL - 7
SN - 2347-2693
ER -

294 Views    240 Downloads    99 Downloads
  
  

Abstract :
A usual aim in longitudinal studies is to characterize the relationship between a dichotomous outcome and both time-independent and time-dependent covariates. In this paper, we study nonlinear generalized mixed-effects regression models for analysis of longitudinal data. We use a two-stage approach that first fits a linear model to the longitudinal data estimating the random effect that describes the trend for each method and then uses the estimated intercept and slope as predictors for the covariates used in a probit model. We show how to adapt a regression calibration and the best linear unbiased obtained from a linear mixed model approaches to this context and compare these approaches with a naive analysis where the estimation error is ignored. The methods are applied to health data collected during a study designed to evaluate the epidemiology of community-acquired sepsis in a larger cohort of infected intensive care unit patients. We show that the straight use of the estimates in the probit model produces biased estimates of their outcome. Nonetheless, regression calibration and linear mixed effect offer little or no advantage when sample sizes are small, they perform best when samples are reasonably large and especially when the error of prediction (measurement error) or the effects are not small. Our study indicates that the naive approach produces weak results and that regression calibration and linear mixed effect method provides a way to obtain unbiased estimators, especially when is correction advocated, practically indistinguishable.

Key-Words / Index Term :
error of prediction, general nonlinear model, longitudinal data

References :
[1]. Póvoa P, M. TPA, Carneiro AH, SACiUCI. PCASSG. C-reactive protein, an early marker of community-acquired sepsisresolution: a multi-center prospective observational study. Critical Care 2011; 15 (4).
[2]. Oliveira R, Teixeira-Pinto A. in press. Lets see 2019; 0: 1959–1971.
[3]. Wang N, Lin X, Gutierrez RG, Carroll RJ. Bias Analysis and SIMEX Approach in Generalized Linear Mixed Measurement Error Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1998; 93(441): 249-261. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1998.10474106
[4]. Fuller W. Measurement Error Models. John Wiley and Sons . 1987.
[5]. Póvoa P. C-reactive protein: a valuable marker of sepsis.. Intensive Care Medicine 2002; 28 (3): 235–243.
[6]. R.C. B, R.A. B, F.B. C, R.P. D, A.M. F, W.J. KWSRS. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis.. In: . 101. ; 1992: 1644-1655.
[7]. McCulloch CE, Searle SR. Generalized, Linear and Mixed Models. Wiley InterScience . 2001.
[8]. Akaike H. Information Theory and an Extension of The Maximum Likelihood Principle. International Symposium on Information Theory 1973; 2: 267–281.
[9]. Erling BA. Asymptotic Properties of Conditional Maximum-Likelihood Estimators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1971; 32: 283–301.
[10]. Armstrong B. Measurement error in the generalized linear model. Commun Stat B Simula Computa 1985; 14: 529–544.
[11]. Armstrong B, Whittemore AS, Howe GR. Analysis of case-control data with covariate measurement error: application to diet and colon cancer. Stat Med 1989; 8: 1151–1163.
[12]. Breslow NE, Holubkov R.Weighted likelihood, pseudo-likelihood and maximum likelihood methods for logistic regression analysis of two-stage data. Statistics in Medicine 1997; 16: 103–116.
[13]. Carroll R, Ruppert D, Stefanski L, Crainiceanu C. Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models: A Modern Perspective. Chapman and Hall . 2006.
[14]. Carroll RJ, Spiegelman CH, Gordon Lan KK, Bailey KT, Abbott RD. On errors-in-variables for binary regression models. Biometrika 1984; 71: 19–25.
[15]. Carroll RJ, Küchenhoff H, Lombard F, Stefanski LA. Asymptotics for the SIMEX estimator in nonlinear measurement error models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1996; 91: 242–250.
[16]. Carroll RJ, Küchenhoff H, Lombard F, Stefanski LA. Asymptotics for the SIMEX estimator in nonlinear measurement error models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1996; 91: 242–250.
[17]. Chen B, Yi GY, Cook RJ.Weighted Generalized Estimating Functions for Longitudinal Response and Covariate Data That Are Missing at Random. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2010; 105: 336–353.
[18]. Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL. The Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Clarendon Press, Oxford . 1993.
[19]. J. G. C-reactive protein: risk factor, biomarker and/or therapeutic target–. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 2010; 26, SupplA: 41A–44A.
[20]. Huang YJ,WangCY. Consistent functional methods for logistic regression with errors in covariates. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2001; 96: 1469–1482.
[21]. Ma Y, Tsiatis AA. Closed form semiparametric estimators for measurement error models. Stat. Sin. 2006; 16: 183–193.
[22]. Chen MH, Ibrahim JG, Shao QM. Propriety of the Posterior Distribution and Existence of the MLE for Regression Models with Covariates Missing at Random. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2004; 99: 421–438.
[23]. Nugent W, Graycheck L, Basham R. A Devil Hidden in the Details: The Effects of Measurement Error in Regression Analysis. Journal of Social Service Research 2000; 27: 53–75.
[24]. Cox C. Nonlinear quasi-likelihood models: applications to continuous proportions. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 1996; 21: 449–461.
[25]. Cox DR. Partial likelihood. Biometrika 1975; 62: 269–276.
[26]. Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang KY, Zeger SL. Analysis of Longitudinal Data, 2nd edition. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. . 2002.
[27]. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied longitudinal analysis. Wiley-Interscience . 2004.
[28]. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Zahner GEP. Multivariate Logistic Models for Incomplete Binary Responses. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1996; 91: 99–108.
[29]. Fitzmaurice GM, Lipsitz SR, Molenberghs G, Ibrahim JG. A Protective Estimator for Longitudinal Binary Data Subject toNon-Ignorable Non-Monotone Missingness. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A 2005; 168: 723–735.
[30]. Fitzmaurice GM, Molenberghs G, Lipsitz SR. Regression Models for Longitudinal Binary Responses with Informative Drop-Outs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B 1995; 57: 691–704.
[31]. Laird NM, Ware JH. Random effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 1982; 38: 963–974.
[32]. Li Y, Lin X. Covariate Measurement Errors in Frailty Models for Clustered Survival Data. Biometrika 2000; 87 (4): 849–866.
[33]. Chaganty NR, Joe H. Efficiency of Generalized Estimating Equations for Binary Responses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 2004; 66: 851–860.
[34]. Cook JR, Stefanski L. Simulation-extrapolation estimation in parametric measurement error models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1994; 89: 1314–1328.
[35]. Rosner B, Spiegelman D, Willett WC. Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for measurement error: the case of multiple covariates measured with error. American Journal of Epidemiology 1990; 132:
[36]. W. SD. Semiparametric maximum likelihood for measurement error regression.. Biometrika 2001; 57: 53–61.
[37]. Stefanski LA, Buzas JS. Instrumental variable estimation in binary regression measurement error models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995; 90: 541–550.
[38]. Stefanski LA, Carroll R. Covariate measurement error in logistic regression. Annals of Statistics 1985; 13: 1335–1351.
[39]. Stefanski LA, Carroll R. Conditional scores and optimal scores for generalized linear measurement-error models. Biometrika 1987; 74: 703–716.
[40]. Tosteson JP, Demidenko E. Covariate measurement error and the estimation of random effect parameters in a mixed model for longitudinal data. Statistics in Medicina 1998; 17: 1959–1971.

Authorization Required

 

You do not have rights to view the full text article.
Please contact administration for subscription to Journal or individual article.
Mail us at  support@isroset.org or view contact page for more details.

Go to Navigation